Re: doc bug for continuous archiving

2020-10-07 Thread Fujii Masao
On 2020/10/08 7:12, Jeff Janes wrote: On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 5:47 PM David G. Johnston mailto:david.g.johns...@gmail.com>> wrote: On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 2:35 PM Jeff Janes mailto:jeff.ja...@gmail.com>> wrote: Quoting the docs: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/13/continuou

Re: doc bug for continuous archiving

2020-10-07 Thread Jeff Janes
On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 5:47 PM David G. Johnston wrote: > On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 2:35 PM Jeff Janes wrote: > >> Quoting the docs: >> >> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/13/continuous-archiving.html >> >> "As with base backups, the easiest way to produce a standalone hot backup >> is to use the pg

Re: doc bug for continuous archiving

2020-10-07 Thread David G. Johnston
On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 2:35 PM Jeff Janes wrote: > Quoting the docs: > > https://www.postgresql.org/docs/13/continuous-archiving.html > > "As with base backups, the easiest way to produce a standalone hot backup > is to use the pg_basebackup tool. If you include the -X parameter when > calling it

doc bug for continuous archiving

2020-10-07 Thread Jeff Janes
Quoting the docs: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/13/continuous-archiving.html "As with base backups, the easiest way to produce a standalone hot backup is to use the pg_basebackup tool. If you include the -X parameter when calling it, all the write-ahead log required to use the backup will be in