Daniel Gustafsson writes:
>> On 22 Sep 2023, at 19:04, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I propose the attached. (I also modified the para's last sentence to
>> speak of "kind" not "type", for consistency with the relkind field name
>> and the rest of the para.)
> LGTM.
Pushed, thanks for looking.
> On 22 Sep 2023, at 19:04, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> I wrote:
>> "Most" here is good English, although I concede it's a slightly
>> old-fashioned usage. Maybe it'd be clearer to just remove the
>> word altogether.
>
>> If we were going to touch this sentence I'd worry about some other
>> things too.
I wrote:
> "Most" here is good English, although I concede it's a slightly
> old-fashioned usage. Maybe it'd be clearer to just remove the
> word altogether.
> If we were going to touch this sentence I'd worry about some other
> things too. Use of "catalogs" as a verb is probably not the greates
