Daniel Gustafsson <[email protected]> writes: >> On 22 Sep 2023, at 19:04, Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote: >> I propose the attached. (I also modified the para's last sentence to >> speak of "kind" not "type", for consistency with the relkind field name >> and the rest of the para.)
> LGTM.
Pushed, thanks for looking.
regards, tom lane
