Re: uniqueness and null could benefit from a hint for dba

2019-12-27 Thread Bruce Momjian
On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 12:13:06PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: > On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 02:00:38PM +0200, Tuomas Leikola wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 5:31 PM Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > Uh, I am wondering if it is just too details for our docs.  Can you > > think of some text and

Re: Why 'infinity' is not in range '[2019-01-02, infinity]'?

2019-12-27 Thread Bruce Momjian
On Wed, Nov 6, 2019 at 08:33:28AM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: > On Wed, Nov 6, 2019 at 12:15:17PM +0200, Eugen Konkov wrote: > > !Specifying a missing bound as exclusive is automatically converted > > !to inclusive, e.g., [,] is automatically converted > > !to (,) > > > > Misspell? >

Re: Documentation: 21.5. Default Roles

2019-12-27 Thread Stephen Frost
Greetings, * PG Doc comments form (nore...@postgresql.org) wrote: > The title is wrong. The roles are not defaults; they are predefined and > privileged. The title suggests that a user should expect to be assigned > these roles. "21.5 Sub-Administrator Roles" would be accurate--improving >

Re: Documentation: 21.5. Default Roles

2019-12-27 Thread Bruce Momjian
On Fri, Dec 27, 2019 at 05:44:10AM +, PG Doc comments form wrote: > The following documentation comment has been logged on the website: > > Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/12/default-roles.html > Description: > > The title is wrong. The roles are not defaults; they are predefined and

Documentation: 21.5. Default Roles

2019-12-27 Thread PG Doc comments form
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website: Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/12/default-roles.html Description: The title is wrong. The roles are not defaults; they are predefined and privileged. The title suggests that a user should expect to be assigned these ro