[BUGS] IpcSemaphoreCreate: semget(...) failed: No space left on device

2003-11-22 Thread jerry
I shortened the error msg to fit it into the subject box. I just completed a fresh install (not upgrade) of MDK 9.2 onto a 1.0 GHz Athlon with 512 MB of RAM. The PostgreSQL 7.3.4 RPMs were installed when I did the MDK 9.2 install, which also created the postgres account. The 'short version' for

Re: [BUGS] RC1 question of reloading data

2003-11-22 Thread jerry
g this doesn't create problems > later. > > Ted Postgres is not a 'database', it is the account name which owns the commands and the directories with which and into which the database structure is created using "initdb". If you followed the short installation ve

Re: [BUGS] IpcSemaphoreCreate: semget(...) failed: No space left on device

2003-11-22 Thread jerry
jerry wrote: > I shortened the error msg to fit it into the subject box. > > I just completed a fresh install (not upgrade) of MDK 9.2 onto a 1.0 GHz > Athlon with 512 MB of RAM. The PostgreSQL 7.3.4 RPMs were installed when > I did the MDK 9.2 install, which also created the p

[BUGS] BUG #5321: Parallel restore temporarily deadlocked by autovacuum analyze

2010-02-09 Thread Jerry Gamache
The following bug has been logged online: Bug reference: 5321 Logged by: Jerry Gamache Email address: jerry.gama...@idilia.com PostgreSQL version: 8.4.2 Operating system: Linux Description:Parallel restore temporarily deadlocked by autovacuum analyze Details: While

Re: [BUGS] BUG #5321: Parallel restore temporarily deadlocked by autovacuum analyze

2010-02-10 Thread Jerry Gamache
All autovacuum and deadlock_timeout settings are at their default values (lines are commented out in postgresql.conf). Alvaro Herrera wrote: Jerry Gamache wrote: The restore resumed while I was writing this report, and I saw these new entries in the logs: ERROR: canceling autovacuum

Re: [BUGS] BUG #5321: Parallel restore temporarily deadlocked by autovacuum analyze

2010-02-10 Thread Jerry Gamache
: Jerry Gamache wrote: The restore resumed while I was writing this report, and I saw these new entries in the logs: ERROR: canceling autovacuum task CONTEXT: automatic analyze of table "database1.public.table_y" ERROR: canceling autovacuum task CONTEXT: automatic analyz

Re: [BUGS] BUG #5321: Parallel restore temporarily deadlocked by autovacuum analyze

2010-02-10 Thread Jerry Gamache
nd blocked. Alvaro Herrera wrote: Jerry Gamache wrote: I was also surprised that table_y seemed to be involved. This is not a typo. Might be caused by a FK constraint between table_y and table_x. From the logs, the autovacuum on table_x was canceled before the one on table_y, but the restore on

Re: [BUGS] BUG #5321: Parallel restore temporarily deadlocked by autovacuum analyze

2010-02-10 Thread Jerry Gamache
Here is the pg_locks output. Alvaro Herrera wrote: Jerry Gamache wrote: I was not able to repro with default parameters, or at 15s naptime, and at 1s naptime I got only 1deadlock in 3 tests. This time the deadlock was with table_a, table_b and table_c (table_x and table_y were not involved

Re: [BUGS] BUG #5321: Parallel restore temporarily deadlocked by autovacuum analyze

2010-02-10 Thread Jerry Gamache
Yes, I have PID in the logs now. Problem was observed around 13h30, and there was no log output between 13h18 and 13h30. There are messages for table_b (pid 18350) and table_c (pid 18406), but none for table_a. Alvaro Herrera wrote: The logs show that the autovacuum of table_b was canceled 20

Re: [BUGS] BUG #5321: Parallel restore temporarily deadlocked by autovacuum analyze

2010-02-10 Thread Jerry Gamache
Alvaro Herrera wrote: Jerry Gamache wrote: Yes, I have PID in the logs now. Problem was observed around 13h30, and there was no log output between 13h18 and 13h30. There are messages for table_b (pid 18350) and table_c (pid 18406), but none for table_a. Eh, but according to the

[BUGS] Problem with restoring database from a pg_dump generated script.

2001-05-11 Thread Jerry Davis
ould have thought it would have everything necessary to restore the database without a problem. I also would have expected that the INSERT INTO statements in the testdump.sql would have appropriately updated the primary key. Is there something missing from the original database that got dumped, or so

Re: [BUGS] BUG #1528: Rows returned that should be excluded by WHERE clause

2005-03-08 Thread Gill, Jerry T.
Just an interesting side note here, this behavior is identical to DB2. I am not sure if that makes it correct or not, but here is an example. [EMAIL PROTECTED] gill]$ db2 "select 2 as id, max(apn3) from phoenix.client where 2 =1" ID 2 --- -- 2 - 1 record(s

Re: [BUGS] BUG #1528: Rows returned that should be excluded by WHERE clause

2005-03-08 Thread Gill, Jerry T.
ECTED] Behalf Of Tom Lane Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2005 11:15 AM To: Gill, Jerry T. Cc: pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [BUGS] BUG #1528: Rows returned that should be excluded by WHERE clause "Gill, Jerry T." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Just an interesting side note

Re: [BUGS] [HACKERS] We are not following the spec for HAVING without GROUP BY

2005-03-10 Thread Gill, Jerry T.
Here is your Sql run in a DB2 database. connect to phoenix Database Connection Information Database server= DB2/LINUX 8.1.5 SQL authorization ID = GILL Local database alias = PHOENIX create table tab (col integer) DB2I The SQL command completed successfully. select 1 fro