On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 18:30, Alan T DeKok wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Hm ... seems to me that is a network security problem, not our problem.
>> Who's to say one of the spoofed packets won't pass verification?
>
> The packets are signed with a shared key. Passing verification means
> either the
Hi,
Can you please send 8.4 installation log which can be found inside %TEMP%.
Thanks,
Dharmendra
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 7:00 AM, Maly Lemire wrote:
>
> The following bug has been logged online:
>
> Bug reference: 5686
> Logged by: Maly Lemire
> Email address: maly.lem...@g
The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 5693
Logged by: vijay
Email address: 4001.v...@gmail.com
PostgreSQL version: 8.1
Operating system: windows
Description:how to restore data from data folder
Details:
Hi
I am using postgresql 8.1 version,my d
El 05/10/2010 4:54, vijay escribió:
The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 5693
Logged by: vijay
Email address: 4001.v...@gmail.com
PostgreSQL version: 8.1
Operating system: windows
Description:how to restore data from data folder
Details:
Hi
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 11:01, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 18:30, Alan T DeKok wrote:
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Hm ... seems to me that is a network security problem, not our problem.
>>> Who's to say one of the spoofed packets won't pass verification?
>>
>> The packets are signe
The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 5694
Logged by: Xiaohui Xue
Email address: xiaohui@sap.com
PostgreSQL version: 8.3.4
Operating system: Windows
Description:Postgres ODBC SQLTables is not working correctly
Details:
Hi,
I'm using PostgreSQ
Magnus Hagander wrote:
> Actually, nevermind that one. Here's a patch I worked up from your
> description, and that turns out to be fairly similar to yours in what
> it does I think - except I'm not rearranging the code into a separate
> function. We already have a while-loop.
Thanks. The only
Alan T DeKok wrote:
> the hard-code 10 could be USECS_PER_SEC.
To save others the time of checking, it's actually 100 in the
patch.
-Kevin
--
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-
Hmm. That is suspiciously close to the location of some last-minute
changes in Postgres 9.0. I wonder whether Andrea is using a version of
PostGIS that was compiled against pre-9.0RC1 Postgres sources.
If so, I am to and it's the latest PostGIS binary from their website.
Hi,
Yes, I will
"Tatsuhito Kasahara" writes:
> The following is a part of doc/src/sgml/user-manag.sgml
> ==
> For example, if for some reason you
>want to disable index scans (hint: not a good idea) anytime you
>connect, you can use:
>
> ALTER ROLE myname SET statement_timeout = '5m
10 matches
Mail list logo