On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 16:01, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> Andrew Chernow wrote:
>>
>>> The only issue now is a small leak of memory in a function that is only
>>> called a fixed (and very small) number of times per process. Given this,
>>> I'm inclined to say we should put it on hold for 8.5. Thought
The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 4944
Logged by: Bruno Scovoli Santos
Email address: bruno.scov...@gmail.com
PostgreSQL version: 8.3.7
Operating system: Ubuntu 9.04 Jaunty Jackalope
Description:Problems with using \set variables as strings in s
"Bruno Scovoli Santos" writes:
> brunodb=# \set nom 'Intel'
> euclidhardware=# select * from fabricantes where nome like :nom;
> ERROR: column "intel" does not exist
> LINE 1: select * from fabricantes where nome like Intel;
If you want to put quotes in the value of a variable, you need
this
\se
The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 4943
Logged by: fous
Email address: honza...@gmail.com
PostgreSQL version: 8.4.0
Operating system: Linux (CentOS release 5.3)
Description:getting error while vacuuming the database
Details:
hi
i'm getting thi
Hallo Bruno,
Am Montag, 27. Juli 2009 15:50 schrieb Bruno Scovoli Santos:
>...
> brunodb=# \set nom 'Intel'
> euclidhardware=# select * from fabricantes where nome like :nom;
> ERROR: column "intel" does not exist
> LINE 1: select * from fabricantes where nome like Intel;
>
> Please, I have trie
The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 4945
Logged by: dan boeriu
Email address: dan.boe...@roost.com
PostgreSQL version: 8.3.6 8.3.7 8.4
Operating system: Redhat Linux
Description:Parallel update(s) gone wild
Details:
In my update I use one table
The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 4946
Logged by: Fabiano
Email address: fabiano.san...@onda.com.br
PostgreSQL version: 8.3
Operating system: windows
Description:bug - libiconv-2.dll
Details:
error libiconv-2.dll
--
Sent via pgsql-bugs maili
On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 21:56 +, dan boeriu wrote:
> What I noticed is that the second will not finish if the READ table has many
> rows to be read (1 million let's say) but it finishes when the read table
> has only a few 1000s of rows.
> Any idea why?
It could be that it _does_ finish ... eve
Please reply to the list, not directly to me.
> I don't think is that simple. The VERY SAME statement runs twice - one
> finishes in about 20 secs the other doesn't finish in 24 hours.
Yep, OK, so it's not just a planning or scaling issue.
Have you checked pg_locks ?
SELECT * FROM pg_locks;
The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 4947
Logged by: Jim Michaels
Email address: jmich...@yahoo.com
PostgreSQL version: 8.4.0
Operating system: Win XP Pro Sp3
Description:libpq PQntuples should return 64-bit number
Details:
I agree that 64-bit nu
10 matches
Mail list logo