On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 16:01, Magnus Hagander<mag...@hagander.net> wrote: > Andrew Chernow wrote: >> >>> The only issue now is a small leak of memory in a function that is only >>> called a fixed (and very small) number of times per process. Given this, >>> I'm inclined to say we should put it on hold for 8.5. Thoughts? >>> >>> >> >> Doesn't sound urgent to me. If it were my decision, I'd punt it to 8.5. > > Ok. Agreed then - added to the commitfest page.
Applied to HEAD. -- Magnus Hagander Self: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/ -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
