Re: [BUGS] BUG #1937: Parts of information_schema only accessible to owner

2005-10-09 Thread Tony Marston
> -Original Message- > From: Peter Eisentraut [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 08 October 2005 14:09 > To: Tony Marston > Cc: pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: [BUGS] BUG #1937: Parts of information_schema > only accessible to owner > > > Please copy replies to the mailing lis

Re: [BUGS] BUG #1947: Enhancement Request - CONCAT() function

2005-10-09 Thread Tony Marston
> -Original Message- > From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 08 October 2005 22:30 > To: Jim C. Nasby > Cc: Tony Marston; pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: [BUGS] BUG #1947: Enhancement Request - CONCAT() > function > > > "Jim C. Nasby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >

[BUGS] BUG #1949: Inserting Unicode hindi numbers

2005-10-09 Thread Maher Abdel Karim
The following bug has been logged online: Bug reference: 1949 Logged by: Maher Abdel Karim Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PostgreSQL version: 8.0.3 Operating system: Windows XP Description:Inserting Unicode hindi numbers Details: I have a database with UNICODE enc

Re: [BUGS] BUG #1949: Inserting Unicode hindi numbers

2005-10-09 Thread Magnus Hagander
> The following bug has been logged online: > > Bug reference: 1949 > Logged by: Maher Abdel Karim > Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > PostgreSQL version: 8.0.3 > Operating system: Windows XP > Description:Inserting Unicode hindi numbers > Details: > > I have a data

Re: [BUGS] BUG #1937: Parts of information_schema only accessible to owner

2005-10-09 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Tom Lane wrote: > Probably there are similar changes in other views. > > Not sure if there's time to do this for 8.1 ... I don't really have > time to grovel through it, do you? I don't think it's reasonable to do this for 8.1. There are probably several conceptual changes across the board that

Re: [BUGS] BUG #1937: Parts of information_schema only accessible to owner

2005-10-09 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Tony Marston wrote: > I disagree. The function description in the SQL 1999 standard says > "Identify the columns of tables defined in this catalog that are > accessible to a given user." It is clear that the actual code sample > given does not conform to this description, First of all, the current

Re: [BUGS] BUG #1947: Enhancement Request - CONCAT() function

2005-10-09 Thread David Fetter
On Sun, Oct 09, 2005 at 11:05:41AM +0100, Tony Marston wrote: > > > "Jim C. Nasby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > And you might want to make it a project at http://pgfoundry.org > > > so others can make use of it. You might also want to define it > > > as accepting an array; I think that would

Re: [BUGS] BUG #1947: Enhancement Request - CONCAT() function

2005-10-09 Thread Tony Marston
> -Original Message- > From: David Fetter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 09 October 2005 18:20 > To: Tony Marston > Cc: 'Tom Lane'; 'Jim C. Nasby'; pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: [BUGS] BUG #1947: Enhancement Request - CONCAT() function > > > On Sun, Oct 09, 2005 at 11:05:4

Re: [BUGS] BUG #1937: Parts of information_schema only accessible to owner

2005-10-09 Thread Tony Marston
> -Original Message- > From: Peter Eisentraut [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 09 October 2005 17:42 > To: Tony Marston > Cc: pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org; 'Stephan Szabo' > Subject: Re: [BUGS] BUG #1937: Parts of information_schema > only accessible to owner > > > Tony Marston wrote: >

[BUGS] BUG #1950: Subroutine info cached in pl/perl

2005-10-09 Thread Greg Sabino Mullane
The following bug has been logged online: Bug reference: 1950 Logged by: Greg Sabino Mullane Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PostgreSQL version: 8.0 and cvs Operating system: Linux Description:Subroutine info cached in pl/perl Details: Inner subroutines seem to be