> -----Original Message----- > From: David Fetter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 09 October 2005 18:20 > To: Tony Marston > Cc: 'Tom Lane'; 'Jim C. Nasby'; pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: [BUGS] BUG #1947: Enhancement Request - CONCAT() function > > > On Sun, Oct 09, 2005 at 11:05:41AM +0100, Tony Marston wrote: > > > > > "Jim C. Nasby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > And you might want to make it a project at > http://pgfoundry.org so > > > > others can make use of it. You might also want to define it as > > > > accepting an array; I think that would allow you to accept any > > > > number of parameters. > > > > > > I think Tony is trying to avoid putting in any actual > work ;-). To > > > me, the sanest change would be to modify his app to use the > > > SQL-standard syntax. Which surely is supported by those other > > > databases too, no? And if not, why are *we* the ones > getting the bug > > > report? > > > > > > regards, tom lane > > > > You are getting this as a bug report for the simple reason > that your > > website does not seem to have a method of accepting enhancement > > requests. That is why I specifically put ENHANCEMENT REQUEST in the > > description. > > I've never seen somebody try so hard to get himself labeled > as a help-rejecting complainer before. Are you *certain* > that this is what you want to do, Tony?
I am just responding in kind. If you can't take it then don't dish it out in the first place. Tony Marston http://www.tonymarston.net ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
