Re: [BUGS] BUG #1528: Rows returned that should be excluded by WHERE clause

2005-03-08 Thread Tom Lane
"Peter Wright" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Description:Rows returned that should be excluded by WHERE clause Interesting point. The view and union don't seem to be the issue; I think the problem can be expressed as regression=# select 2 as id, max(b) from t2 having 2 = 1; id | max --

[BUGS] BUG #1531: rotated log truncation broken

2005-03-08 Thread Markus Bertheau
The following bug has been logged online: Bug reference: 1531 Logged by: Markus Bertheau Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PostgreSQL version: 8.0.1 Operating system: Linux FC3 Description:rotated log truncation broken Details: The log truncation is broken for me. It

Re: [BUGS] BUG #1531: rotated log truncation broken

2005-03-08 Thread Richard Huxton
Markus Bertheau wrote: The following bug has been logged online: Bug reference: 1531 Logged by: Markus Bertheau Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PostgreSQL version: 8.0.1 Operating system: Linux FC3 Description:rotated log truncation broken Details: The log truncation

Re: [BUGS] [pgsql-www] Likely typo in FAQ_DEV.html

2005-03-08 Thread Robert Treat
On Monday 07 March 2005 16:22, Robert Treat wrote: > On Sunday 06 March 2005 15:25, Hashem Masoud wrote: > Thanks for the report! Attached patch fixes this and 3-4 other typos as > well. Hashem has kindly pointed out a few more typos in the FAQ that I have added in, please apply this patch inste

Re: [BUGS] BUG #1531: rotated log truncation broken

2005-03-08 Thread Tom Lane
"Markus Bertheau" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The log truncation is broken for me. It works as advertised, and I follow > the argumentation behind it, but for my scenario it is not working: > I use the computer only in work hours; it's shut down in the night. > I use the standard log rotation t

Re: [BUGS] BUG #1528: Rows returned that should be excluded by WHERE clause

2005-03-08 Thread Gill, Jerry T.
Just an interesting side note here, this behavior is identical to DB2. I am not sure if that makes it correct or not, but here is an example. [EMAIL PROTECTED] gill]$ db2 "select 2 as id, max(apn3) from phoenix.client where 2 =1" ID 2 --- -- 2 - 1 record(s

Re: [BUGS] BUG #1528: Rows returned that should be excluded by WHERE clause

2005-03-08 Thread Tom Lane
"Gill, Jerry T." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Just an interesting side note here, this behavior is identical to DB2. I am > not sure if that makes it correct or not, but here is an example. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] gill]$ db2 "select 2 as id, max(apn3) from phoenix.client > where 2 =1" > ID

Re: [BUGS] BUG #1528: Rows returned that should be excluded by WHERE clause

2005-03-08 Thread Gill, Jerry T.
Sorry Tom, I missed a sentence in you previous email. My understanding of the having clause is that the row should be filtered. Here is the same example with the having clause in DB2. [EMAIL PROTECTED] gill]$ db2 "select 2 as id, max(apn3) from phoenix.client having 2 =1" ID 2 --