Re: [BUGS] BUG #5747: TimeStamps too far into the future are invalid

2010-11-10 Thread Chris Browne
t...@sss.pgh.pa.us (Tom Lane) writes: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JUDDI-374 There's an issue that JDBC doesn't cope very well with 'Infinity' values, which is more or less the opposite of what's reported here. I have been tending to put "don't allow +/-Infinity" constraints onto time

Re: [BUGS] BUG #5747: TimeStamps too far into the future are invalid

2010-11-10 Thread Tom Lane
"Kurt Stam" writes: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JUDDI-374 There is no evidence whatsoever on that page to demonstrate that there's any such postgresql bug. What's more, simple testing suggests that PG is perfectly happy with timestamps of 2100 or even further out. If you'd like us t