"Kurt Stam" <ks...@apache.org> writes:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JUDDI-374
There is no evidence whatsoever on that page to demonstrate that there's
any such postgresql bug. What's more, simple testing suggests that PG
is perfectly happy with timestamps of 2100 or even further out. If
you'd like us to believe we have something to fix, please exhibit some
SQL commands that deliver an incorrect result.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
