Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> If not, we needn't worry about it, IMHO. But if there are, I can
>> take a look at producing a low-risk version of this changed for
>> application to REL7_3_STABLE.
>
> Go for it.
Just FYI, I'm really busy with vario
Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Are there plans for a 7.3.5 release?
Yes, I think there will be a 7.3.5 fairly soon.
> If not, we needn't worry about
> it, IMHO. But if there are, I can take a look at producing a low-risk
> version of this changed for application to REL7_3_STABLE.
Go f
Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Well, it was done as part of a significant set of changes to
> pg_dumpall:
Are there plans for a 7.3.5 release? If not, we needn't worry about
it, IMHO. But if there are, I can take a look at producing a low-risk
version of this changed for application to REL
Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is this a candidate for being back-patched to 7_3_STABLE? IMHO it
> would be useful and low-risk.
Well, it was done as part of a significant set of changes to pg_dumpall:
2003-05-30 18:55 tgl
* src/bin/pg_dump/: dumputils.c, dumputils.h, pg_dump
Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Paul Tillotson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> pg_dumpall does not save all access control permissions on a database.
>> (This is true for at least the CREATE permission.)
>
> This is fixed as of 7.4.
Is this a candidate for being back-patched to 7_3_STABLE? I
Paul Tillotson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> pg_dumpall does not save all access control permissions on a database.
> (This is true for at least the CREATE permission.)
This is fixed as of 7.4.
regards, tom lane
---(end of broadcast)---
This is fixed in 7.4.X and in fact 7.4 pg_dumpall will work on a 7.3.X
database.
---
Paul Tillotson wrote:
>
> POSTGRESQL
POSTGRESQL BUG REPORT TEMPLATE
Your name : Paul Tillotson
Your email address : ptchristendom at yaho
