Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> If not, we needn't worry about it, IMHO. But if there are, I can >> take a look at producing a low-risk version of this changed for >> application to REL7_3_STABLE. > > Go for it.
Just FYI, I'm really busy with various other things, so I'm not going to get time to tackle this any time soon. FWIW, I briefly looked at the original diff, and it doesn't seem trivial to extract a low-risk version of the change for backpatching. If someone feels strongly this needs to make it into 7.3.5, speak up, and/or please backpatch it yourself; otherwise, don't hold up 7.3.5 for it. -Neil ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
