Re: [BUGS] SQLCODE==-209

2001-10-16 Thread John Summerfield
On Thu, 11 Oct 2001, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > I have added documentation for code 209. Looks like there are other > undocumented ones. Should we document them all? If you're asking me, I'm all in favour of documenting them;-) I'm not a fan of "Read the source," though I do it if I'm desperat

Re: [BUGS] SQLCODE==-209

2001-10-11 Thread Bruce Momjian
I have added documentation for code 209. Looks like there are other undocumented ones. Should we document them all? > John Summerfield writes: > > > I'm using 7.2devel from CVS, and as I've already reported, the documentation >doesn't build. > > http://www.ca.postgresql.org/devel-corner/doc

Re: [BUGS] SQLCODE==-209

2001-09-18 Thread John Summerfield
On Thu, 13 Sep 2001, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > John Summerfield writes: > > > I'm using 7.2devel from CVS, and as I've already reported, the documentation >doesn't build. > > http://www.ca.postgresql.org/devel-corner/docs/postgres/index.html I don't normally have web access. I'd much prefer th

Re: [BUGS] SQLCODE==-209

2001-09-18 Thread John Summerfield
Sorry all. There was a certain amount of nonsence in my previous posting on this topic. The failing sql command is an fact a select into. It fails when trying to retrieve a null value. The insert worked (I can retrieve the record if I don't ask for the null field, so evidently the insert code i

Re: [BUGS] SQLCODE==-209

2001-09-17 Thread Peter Eisentraut
John Summerfield writes: > I don't normally have web access. You can download the built documentation from ftp://ftp.de.postgresql.org/pub/dev/doc/ Copy the files man.tar.gz and postgres.tar.gz into the doc/ directory of your source distribution and they will be installed automatically. > I'd

Re: [BUGS] SQLCODE==-209

2001-09-13 Thread Peter Eisentraut
John Summerfield writes: > I'm using 7.2devel from CVS, and as I've already reported, the documentation doesn't >build. http://www.ca.postgresql.org/devel-corner/docs/postgres/index.html > Consequently I'm forced to rely on documentation for 7.1.2/3 which > does not mention -209, at least in t

[BUGS] SQLCODE==-209

2001-09-13 Thread John Summerfield
I'm using 7.2devel from CVS, and as I've already reported, the documentation doesn't build. Consequently I'm forced to rely on documentation for 7.1.2/3 which does not mention -209, at least in the ecpg documentation I'm looking at, Nore does it appear in the DB2 documentation I'm using as sec