I have added documentation for code 209. Looks like there are other
undocumented ones. Should we document them all?
> John Summerfield writes:
>
> > I'm using 7.2devel from CVS, and as I've already reported, the documentation
>doesn't build.
>
> http://www.ca.postgresql.org/devel-corner/docs/postgres/index.html
>
> > Consequently I'm forced to rely on documentation for 7.1.2/3 which
> > does not mention -209, at least in the ecpg documentation I'm looking
> > at,
>
> 7.2 doesn't document it either...
>
> --
> Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
>
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
Index: doc/src/sgml/ecpg.sgml
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/pgsql/doc/src/sgml/ecpg.sgml,v
retrieving revision 1.23
diff -c -r1.23 ecpg.sgml
*** doc/src/sgml/ecpg.sgml 2001/09/13 15:55:22 1.23
--- doc/src/sgml/ecpg.sgml 2001/10/11 20:04:49
***************
*** 332,337 ****
--- 332,347 ----
</varlistentry>
<varlistentry>
+ <term><computeroutput>-209, NULL value without indicator in line
+%d.</computeroutput></term>
+ <listitem>
+ <para>
+ <productname>Postgres</productname> returned
+<symbol>ECPG_MISSING_INDICATOR</symbol>
+ because a NULL was returned and no NULL indicator variable was supplied.
+ </para>
+ </listitem>
+ </varlistentry>
+
+ <varlistentry>
<term><computeroutput>-220, No such connection %s in line
%d.</computeroutput></term>
<listitem>
<para>
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
