Hi!
Tom Lane [2005-05-13 9:49 -0400]:
> Martin Pitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > We recently got the bug report below. Do you agree that documenting
> > ~/.pgpass in psql(1) is a good idea?
>
> On that theory we'd have to replicate large parts of the libpq
> documentation on every one of the
Tom Lane wrote:
> Martin Pitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > We recently got the bug report below. Do you agree that documenting
> > ~/.pgpass in psql(1) is a good idea?
>
> On that theory we'd have to replicate large parts of the libpq
> documentation on every one of the "client application" pag
Martin Pitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> We recently got the bug report below. Do you agree that documenting
> ~/.pgpass in psql(1) is a good idea?
On that theory we'd have to replicate large parts of the libpq
documentation on every one of the "client application" pages,
which doesn't seem very
Hi PostgreSQL developers!
We recently got the bug report below. Do you agree that documenting
~/.pgpass in psql(1) is a good idea?
Thanks for considering and have a nice day!
Martin
- Forwarded message from Jari Aalto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Subject: Bug#308535: postgresql-client: [psql]
