Hi PostgreSQL developers! We recently got the bug report below. Do you agree that documenting ~/.pgpass in psql(1) is a good idea?
Thanks for considering and have a nice day!
Martin
----- Forwarded message from Jari Aalto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -----
Subject: Bug#308535: postgresql-client: [psql] manual page does not document
~/.pgpass file
Reply-To: Jari Aalto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Jari Aalto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 23:26:00 +0300
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50 autolearn=no
version=3.0.2
Package: postgresql-client
Version: 7.4.7-6
Severity: minor
psql(1) manual page does not mention in the FILES section ~/.pgpass file
and how it is used. It should include:
FILES
...
o The file ~/.pgpass in is a file that can contain passwords to be
used if the connection requires a password (and no password has
been specified otherwise). This file should have lines of the
following format:
hostname:port:database:username:password
Each of the first four fields may be a literal value, or *, which
matches anything. The password field from the first line that matches
the current connection parameters will be used. (Therefore, put
more-specific entries first when you are using wildcards.) If an entry
needs to contain : or \, escape this character with \.
The permissions on .pgpass must disallow any access to world or group;
achieve this by the command chmod 0600 ~/.pgpass. If the permissions
are less strict than this, the file will be ignored.
This explanation was exerpted from
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/7.4/static/libpq-pgpass.html
I have no idea why it is there, where nobidy is looking
----- End forwarded message -----
--
Martin Pitt http://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developer http://www.ubuntulinux.org
Debian Developer http://www.debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
