[Adding the OP back to CC, in case he's not subscribed to the list]
Mark Kirkwood wrote:
> On 09/09/12 14:01, Kevin Grittner wrote:
>> "Pieter Viljoen Sr." wrote:
>>
>>> The TWO most important factors in hindering us to convert to
>>> Postgres are the following:
>>>
>>> Parallel execution of qu
On 09/09/12 9:31 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
2/ Is anyone working on parallel query execution?
someone presented a FOSS project on the pg-general list the other day
that implements parallel execution using a postgres based engine, but
it only supports fairly simple queries. I can't say I reme
On 09/09/12 6:04 PM, Mark Kirkwood wrote:
1/ What is the current state of table partitioning...is anyone working
on something a bit more native than abusing inheritance?
enterpriseDB's commercial 'oracle compatible' fork has the Oracle DDL
for creating and managing partitions, but afaik, it us
On 09/09/12 14:01, Kevin Grittner wrote:
wrote:
The TWO most important factors in hindering us to convert to
Postgres are the following:
Parallel execution of queries.
No Table Partitioning
Not a bug, so off-topic for this list. If you need help figuring
out how best to use PostgreSQL, or
wrote:
> The TWO most important factors in hindering us to convert to
> Postgres are the following:
>
> Parallel execution of queries.
>
> No Table Partitioning
Not a bug, so off-topic for this list. If you need help figuring
out how best to use PostgreSQL, or whether it is a good fit for
yo
The following bug has been logged on the website:
Bug reference: 7524
Logged by: Pieter Viljoen
Email address: pie...@infomet.com
PostgreSQL version: 9.1.5
Operating system: WIndows Enterprise Server
Description:
The TWO most important factors in hindering us to conve
