[Adding the OP back to CC, in case he's not subscribed to the list] Mark Kirkwood wrote: > On 09/09/12 14:01, Kevin Grittner wrote: >> "Pieter Viljoen Sr." wrote: >> >>> The TWO most important factors in hindering us to convert to >>> Postgres are the following: >>> >>> Parallel execution of queries. >>> >>> No Table Partitioning >> >> Not a bug, so off-topic for this list. If you need help figuring >> out how best to use PostgreSQL, or whether it is a good fit for >> your use-case, a post to pgsql-nov...@postgresql.org would be more >> appropriate. >> >> > > Or even -hackers - but it would make sense to ask 2 questions along > the lines of: > > 1/ What is the current state of table partitioning...is anyone > working on something a bit more native than abusing inheritance? > > 2/ Is anyone working on parallel query execution? Yeah, I should have mentioned keeping each thread to a single topic. But I would still think -novice or -general would be more appropriate unless he was looking to write or sponsor packages for the features; so it depends. -Kevin
-- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
