On Tue, 28 Oct 2003, Tom Lane wrote:
> "scott.marlowe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Is it possible to remove the implicit search path of pg_catalog from a
> > psql session without it breaking lots of stuff?
>
> Do you consider "+", "count()", etc to be important stuff?
Me, hardly ever use th
On Tue, 28 Oct 2003, Tom Lane wrote:
> Rod Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I say leave it the way it is. If you want system table tab completion,
> > simply:
> > ALTER USER ... SET search_path =3D pg_catalog,...;
>
> Unfortunately, that *does not* affect the tab-completion behavior
On Tue, 2003-10-28 at 19:34, scott.marlowe wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Oct 2003, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > "scott.marlowe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Is it possible to remove the implicit search path of pg_catalog from a
> > > psql session without it breaking lots of stuff?
> >
> > Do you consider "+
"scott.marlowe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is it possible to remove the implicit search path of pg_catalog from a
> psql session without it breaking lots of stuff?
Do you consider "+", "count()", etc to be important stuff?
regards, tom lane
---
On Tue, 2003-10-28 at 18:49, Tom Lane wrote:
> Rod Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I say leave it the way it is. If you want system table tab completion,
> > simply:
> > ALTER USER ... SET search_path =3D pg_catalog,...;
>
> Unfortunately, that *does not* affect the tab-completion b
Rod Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I say leave it the way it is. If you want system table tab completion,
> simply:
> ALTER USER ... SET search_path =3D pg_catalog,...;
Unfortunately, that *does not* affect the tab-completion behavior;
it will still not offer the system catalogs as c
> Anyway, it seems like we need a vote to see how many people prefer
> each choice.
I say leave it the way it is. If you want system table tab completion,
simply:
ALTER USER ... SET search_path = pg_catalog,...;
I would like to see the information_schema be a part of the default
search_p
