On Tue, 28 Oct 2003, Tom Lane wrote:
> "scott.marlowe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Is it possible to remove the implicit search path of pg_catalog from a
> > psql session without it breaking lots of stuff?
>
> Do you consider "+", "count()", etc to be important stuff?
Me, hardly ever use them :-) So I can assume that removing the implicit
pg_catalog from the search path is a "bad thing."
In that case, does my proposed solution of having to implicitly include
pg_catalog in your search path to get it to be seen by tab completion as
just another schema make sense?
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
joining column's datatypes do not match
