[BUGS] BUG #8354: stripped positions can generate nonzero rank in ts_rank_cd

2013-08-02 Thread alex
The following bug has been logged on the website: Bug reference: 8354 Logged by: Alex Hill Email address: a...@hill.net.au PostgreSQL version: 9.2.4 Operating system: OS X 10.8.4 Mountain Lion Description: Hi all, The docs for ts_rank_cd state: "This fun

Re: [BUGS] Unable to handle error in plperl

2013-07-15 Thread Alex Hunsaker
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 5:56 AM, Ming Lai wrote: > I know how elog works. elog only show the status, but it does not allow me > to execute another query when the current query fails because one of the > invalid column was specified. Hrm? Im not sure what you mean. If you elog(ERROR) outside of

Re: [BUGS] Unable to handle error in plperl

2013-07-11 Thread Alex Hunsaker
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 2:36 PM, Alex Lai wrote: > Dear all, > > I have a situation. I am unable to pass control back to the function once > it hit the "undefined_column" error code. > I am not sure there's a way to return '123' instead exit from the fun

[BUGS] Unable to handle error in plperl

2013-07-10 Thread Alex Lai
URNS text as $$ my $sql = ""; my $status = ""; my $r = ""; $sql = 'SELECT exist_column from a_table limit 1'; eval { spi_exec_query($sql);}; if ($@) { $status = 'invalid: '.$@; elog(ERROR, $status); return '123'

[BUGS] BUG #7783: lower & upper function incorrect work

2013-01-03 Thread alex . shniperson
The following bug has been logged on the website: Bug reference: 7783 Logged by: Alexander Shniperson Email address: alex.shniper...@gmail.com PostgreSQL version: 9.1.7 Operating system: osx lion 10.7.5 Description: Hi. I have problem at my project, try to do simple

[BUGS] BUG #7781: pgagent incorrect installation

2013-01-03 Thread alex . shniperson
The following bug has been logged on the website: Bug reference: 7781 Logged by: Alexander Shniperson Email address: alex.shniper...@gmail.com PostgreSQL version: 9.1.7 Operating system: osx lion 10.7.5 Description: Hi. Just installed last PostgreSQL 9.1.7 and instal

[BUGS] Re: [BUGS] Re: [BUGS] BUG #6645: Getting an error with “ERROR: PL/Perl function must return reference to hash or array”?

2012-05-16 Thread Alex Hunsaker
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 11:53 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > Alex Hunsaker writes: >> That being said it seems we failed to take any magic (aka string >> overloads) that a blessed reference might have. Ill see about >> submitting a patch for 9.3 (9.2 just entered beta). Anyone have

[BUGS] Re: [BUGS] BUG #6645: Getting an error with “ERROR: PL/Perl function must return reference to hash or array”?

2012-05-16 Thread Alex Hunsaker
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 10:47 AM, wrote: > The following bug has been logged on the website: > > Bug reference:      6645 > Logged by:          Evna Carroll > Email address:      m...@evancarroll.com > PostgreSQL version: 9.1.2 > Operating system:   Linux > Description: > > This is a cross post f

Re: [BUGS] hstore parser incorrectly handles malformed input

2012-04-28 Thread Alex Hunsaker
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 17:20, Ryan Kelly wrote: > I don't think any language supports the empty key edge case in this way. > The only language I know of that will let you get away with it is Perl, > and in that case you get undef, not the empty string, and it's a warning > if you have warnings o

Re: [BUGS] BUG #6571: Postgres Kills 'Select 1' query randomly on hot standby databases

2012-04-05 Thread Alex Matzinger
Dropping the BEGIN has cleared up the issue. Thank you. On 4/3/2012 9:50 AM, John R Pierce wrote: On 04/03/12 9:40 AM, Tom Lane wrote: Alex Matzinger writes: > The connection that is executing the SELECT 1 are generally open for 1-5 > hours before they are killed. The sp

Re: [BUGS] BUG #6571: Postgres Kills 'Select 1' query randomly on hot standby databases

2012-04-03 Thread Alex Matzinger
quiet large, usually several megabytes. Alex On 4/2/2012 11:49 PM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: On 03.04.2012 02:23, amatzin...@experts-exchange.com wrote: On a hot standby database, while the primary is being updated, Postgres will randomly kill a process which is performing a "Select 1"

Re: [BUGS] BUG #6511: calling spi_exec_query from non-main package, results in: couldn't fetch $_TD

2012-03-21 Thread Alex Hunsaker
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 14:40, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > Excerpts from Alex Hunsaker's message of mié mar 07 01:08:25 -0300 2012: >> The attached fixes it for me, It would be great if you could confirm that. > > Thanks -- applied to 9.1 and master. Thanks! -- Sent via

Re: [BUGS] BUG #6511: calling spi_exec_query from non-main package, results in: couldn't fetch $_TD

2012-03-16 Thread Alex Hunsaker
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 16:13, Bruce Momjian wrote: > On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 09:08:25PM -0700, Alex Hunsaker wrote: >> [ Calling a plperl trigger function from a plperl function ] >> >> Yeah, there were some optimization done for 9.1 to try and make calls >> a bit fa

Re: [BUGS] BUG #6511: calling spi_exec_query from non-main package, results in: couldn't fetch $_TD

2012-03-06 Thread Alex Hunsaker
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 12:19, wrote: > The following bug has been logged on the website: > > Bug reference:      6511 > Logged by:          Mark Murawski > Email address:      ma...@kobaz.net > PostgreSQL version: 9.1.3 > Operating system:   Linux - Debian Squeeze postgres 9.1 from backports > De

Re: [BUGS] BUG #6426: Complex query runs 10 times longer with "LIMIT 20"

2012-02-01 Thread Alex Lai
Andrew Schetinin wrote: Hi Alex, Thank you. I played with subqueries, but in this case I did not see a good enough improvement. In my specific case, what I've seen from the query execution plans, is that without LIMIT the query uses Hash Joins, but once I add LIMIT, it starts using N

Re: [BUGS] BUG #6426: Complex query runs 10 times longer with "LIMIT 20"

2012-02-01 Thread Alex Lai
rchiveset on filemeta_archiveset a (cost=0.00..5.21 rows=1 width=4) (actual time=0.011..0.011 rows=0 loops=108) Index Cond: ((a.fileid = b.fileid) AND (a.archiveset = 61000)) -> Index Scan using pk_filemeta_l3 on filemeta_l3 b (cost=0.00..3.37

Re: [BUGS] BUG #6344: Trouble with plperl

2011-12-18 Thread Alex Hunsaker
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 01:25, wrote: > The following bug has been logged on the website: > > Bug reference:      6344 > Logged by:          Kirill > Email address:      k_deni...@inbox.ru > PostgreSQL version: 9.1.2 > Operating system:   Linux Debian > Description: > > plperl function: > open(FI

Re: [BUGS] BUG #6300: duplicate key value violates unique constraint

2011-11-18 Thread Alex Hunsaker
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 14:31, Tigran Mkrtchyan wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 9:52 PM, Tomas Vondra wrote: > > Anyway this definitely is not a bug, > > Still not convinced. You are unlikely to convince anyone here otherwise... Its works that way by design. > [...] I don't think you will

Re: [BUGS] plperl no longer provides string representations of composite values

2011-10-28 Thread Alex Hunsaker
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 16:42, Mischa POSLAWSKY wrote: > Composite types are converted to and from Perl hashes since commit > REL9_1_ALPHA4~146 (Convert Postgres arrays to Perl arrays on PL/perl input > arguments; 2011-02-17), but are not stringified as claimed by the commit > message and release

Re: [BUGS] BUG #6256: loading small file eats all memory and crashes system

2011-10-15 Thread Alex Hunsaker
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 14:16, Rachael Nelson wrote: > Attached is a tiny bit of top output (top.txt), the file being imported > (postgres.sql.gz - about 32MB), and the perl module script that generates Thanks. So the problem here seems to be postgres does not handle a multi-hundred megabyte sing

Re: [BUGS] BUG #6256: loading small file eats all memory and crashes system

2011-10-15 Thread Alex Hunsaker
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 13:40, Rachael Nelson wrote: > When I run this it does the same: > > psql test dev < postgres.sql > > the db is named test, connecting with the dev user. I assume you meant to hit reply all :-) If you can provide a self contained test case ideally in the form of an .sql f

Re: [BUGS] BUG #6256: loading small file eats all memory and crashes system

2011-10-15 Thread Alex Hunsaker
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 21:43, Rachael wrote: > > The following bug has been logged online: > > Bug reference:      6256 > Logged by:          Rachael > Email address:      rulonr...@gmail.com > PostgreSQL version: 9.11 > Operating system:   Arch  Linux > Description:        loading small file eat

Re: [BUGS] BUG #6204: Using plperl functions generate crash

2011-09-14 Thread Alex Hunsaker
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 03:15, pasman wrote: > > The following bug has been logged online: > > Bug reference:      6204 > Logged by:          pasman > Email address:      pasma...@gmail.com > PostgreSQL version: 9.1.0 > Operating system:   WinXP sp3 > Description:        Using plperl functions gen

Re: [BUGS] BUG #6198: init-po fails for plperl due to invalid xsubpp path (contains ExtUtils)

2011-09-04 Thread Alex Hunsaker
On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 16:57, Tomas Vondra wrote: > On 5 Září 2011, 0:27, Alex Hunsaker wrote: >> On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 13:48, init-po fails for plperl due to invalid >> xsubpp path wrote: > So yes, it's almost the same as your results. > > > Aha

Re: [BUGS] BUG #6198: init-po fails for plperl due to invalid xsubpp path (contains ExtUtils)

2011-09-04 Thread Alex Hunsaker
On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 13:48, init-po fails for plperl due to invalid xsubpp path wrote: > > Description:        init-po fails for plperl due to invalid xsubpp path > (contains ExtUtils) > Details: > > When I try to prepare a fresh .pot file for plpgsql, it fails like this > >  $ ./configure --ena

[BUGS] BUG #6166: configure from source fails with 'This platform is not thread-safe.' but was actually /tmp perms

2011-08-17 Thread Alex Soto
The following bug has been logged online: Bug reference: 6166 Logged by: Alex Soto Email address: aps...@gmail.com PostgreSQL version: 9.0.4 Operating system: Linux (CentOS release 5.0 (Final)) Description:configure from source fails with 'This platform is not t

[BUGS] BUG #6159: Can't create unlogged table

2011-08-11 Thread Alex
The following bug has been logged online: Bug reference: 6159 Logged by: Alex Email address: perepelica.a...@gmail.com PostgreSQL version: 9.1beta3 Operating system: linux x86_64 archlinux Description:Can't create unlogged table Details: Execute from pg

Re: [BUGS] BUG #6139: LIMIT doesn't return correct result when the value is huge

2011-08-02 Thread Alex Hunsaker
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 00:25, Hitoshi Harada wrote: > db1=# select * from test_xy order by x LIMIT 9223372036854775807 OFFSET 6; [ ...] > db1=# select * from test_xy order by x LIMIT pow(2, 63); > ERROR:  bigint out of range > ERROR:  bigint out of range > > Maybe a parser converts literal unexp

[BUGS] BUG #6138: Install failed

2011-08-01 Thread Alex Dragojlovic
The following bug has been logged online: Bug reference: 6138 Logged by: Alex Dragojlovic Email address: aleksandar.dragojlo...@gmail.com PostgreSQL version: 8.4 Operating system: OSX Lion Description:Install failed Details: I cannot install PostgreSql on my laptop

[BUGS] BUG #6054: Insert to table, which has fkey to table,which is parenttable for another table - error

2011-06-07 Thread Alex
The following bug has been logged online: Bug reference: 6054 Logged by: Alex Email address: alexander.ochkal...@gmail.com PostgreSQL version: 8.4.8 Operating system: CentOS Description:Insert to table, which has fkey to table,which is parenttable for another table

Re: [BUGS] 9.1 plperlu bug with null rows in trigger hash

2011-05-30 Thread Alex Hunsaker
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 11:02, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Excerpts from Alvaro Herrera's message of sáb may 28 01:06:42 -0400 2011: >> Excerpts from Alex Hunsaker's message of vie may 27 12:14:25 -0400 2011: >> > On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 20:08, Greg Sabino Mullane >&

Re: [BUGS] 9.1 plperlu bug with null rows in trigger hash

2011-05-27 Thread Alex Hunsaker
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 20:08, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote: > On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 05:04:40PM -0600, Alex Hunsaker wrote: > ... >> Greg, can you confirm the attached fixes it for you? > > Yes, seems to have done the job, thank you. Thanks for testing! [ Does a little dance to

Re: [BUGS] 9.1 plperlu bug with null rows in trigger hash

2011-05-23 Thread Alex Hunsaker
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 14:59, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote: > I've not been able to duplicate this in a standalone script yet, > but in the guts of Bucardo is a trigger function called validate_goat() > that is giving this error on 9.1 HEAD, but not on previous versions: > > "Failed to add table "pu

Re: [BUGS] Plperl trigger variables no longer global

2011-05-16 Thread Alex Hunsaker
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 14:02, Robert Haas wrote: >> Fixed in the attached plus added regression tests for both issues (use >> strict; && Global symbol "$_TD" requires explicit package name, test >> recursive trigger calls). Although Ill admit, given the point we are >> in the release I could see

Re: [BUGS] Upgrading from 1.10 to 1.12 - cannot set up server

2011-05-10 Thread Bryant, Alex
...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, May 09, 2011 7:39 PM To: Bryant, Alex Cc: pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org; Lowe, Doug Subject: Re: [BUGS] Upgrading from 1.10 to 1.12 - cannot set up server On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 3:29 PM, Bryant, Alex wrote: > We are moving from PGAdmin III 1.10 on Windows XP Pro 32 bit to

[BUGS] BUG #6010: booting problem

2011-05-06 Thread alex
The following bug has been logged online: Bug reference: 6010 Logged by: alex Email address: alexandr.kas...@gmail.com PostgreSQL version: 9.1 beta1 Operating system: snow leopard Description:booting problem Details: after changing sysctl.conf values and rebooting

Re: [BUGS] Plperl trigger variables no longer global

2011-05-05 Thread Alex Hunsaker
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 06:51, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Excerpts from Alex Hunsaker's message of mié may 04 23:53:34 -0300 2011: > >> After playing with it a bit more I see 2 clear options: >> 1) make $_TD global like %_SHARED. This should not cause any problems >> as w

Re: [BUGS] Plperl trigger variables no longer global

2011-05-04 Thread Alex Hunsaker
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 16:20, Alex Hunsaker wrote: > > This seems to be broken by > http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=postgresql.git;a=commit;h=ef19dc6d39dd2490ff61489da55d95d6941140bf > (Set up PLPerl trigger data using C code instead of Perl code.) > > Im not sure wha

Re: [BUGS] Plperl trigger variables no longer global

2011-05-04 Thread Alex Hunsaker
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 17:40, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote: > This works in 9.0 but not in git/9.1 beta: > > CREATE FUNCTION wheredidmytdgo() > RETURNS TRIGGER > LANGUAGE plperlu > AS > $bc$ >    use strict; use warnings; >    my $new = $_TD->{new}; >    return; > $bc$; > > The error is: > > ERROR:  

[BUGS] Upgrading from 1.10 to 1.12 - cannot set up server

2011-04-22 Thread Bryant, Alex
We are moving from PGAdmin III 1.10 on Windows XP Pro 32 bit to PG Admin III on Windows 7 Enterprise 64-bit. PG Admin III installed without issue and the computer is running all other database programs normally. When we open up PG Admin III and click Server-Add, we are entering exactly the same

Re: [BUGS] postgres 9 streaming replication

2011-03-25 Thread Alex Lai
Fujii Masao wrote: On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 9:07 PM, Alex Lai wrote: I have no idea why I keep getting the message:\ could not connect to the primary server: FATAL: no pg_hba.conf entry for replication connection from host "slave_server_ip", user "my_super_user_name"

[BUGS] BUG #5950: backend terminating after altering table

2011-03-25 Thread alex
The following bug has been logged online: Bug reference: 5950 Logged by: alex Email address: perepelica.a...@gmail.com PostgreSQL version: 9.0.3 Operating system: archlinux x86_64 Description:backend terminating after altering table Details: Such steps: 1. create

Re: [BUGS] postgres 9 streaming replication

2011-03-23 Thread Alex Lai
database_name -f master_ip -p 5432 From master server, I can connect from master to slave by the following command. psql database_name -f slave_ip -p 5432 I have no idea why I keep getting the message:\ could not connect to the primary server: FATAL: no pg_hba.conf entry for replication conne

[BUGS] BUG #5941: i don t understand

2011-03-22 Thread GIMENEZ alex
The following bug has been logged online: Bug reference: 5941 Logged by: GIMENEZ alex Email address: parabuenara...@hotmail.com PostgreSQL version: 8.4 Operating system: windows 7 Description:i don t understand Details: hello i have a probleme to install poker

Re: [BUGS] BUG #5665: catalog/schemapg.h: No such file or directory

2011-01-29 Thread Dylan Alex Simon
I'm seeing this problem too, so I might be able to shed some light on it. Here's exactly what I did: > cd /usr/src/postgresql-9.0.2 > tar -xjvf postgresql-9.0.2.tar.bz2 > mv postgresql-9.0.2 src > mkdir obj-x86_64 > cd obj-x86_64 > /usr/src/postgresql-9.0.2/src/configure > '--prefix=/usr/local/p

Re: [BUGS] BUG #5835: PL/Python crashes

2011-01-13 Thread Alex Hunsaker
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 06:57, Julien Demoor wrote: > > The following bug has been logged online: > > Bug reference:      5835 > Logged by:          Julien Demoor > Email address:      jdem...@gmail.com > PostgreSQL version: 9.0.2 > Operating system:   Ubuntu Linux > Description:        PL/Python

Re: [BUGS] BUG #5719: Constraint Problem

2010-10-22 Thread Alex Hunsaker
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 12:03, Alex Hunsaker wrote: > Or if you just want the not null constraints: > create table kittu1 (like kota1 including constraints); Correction, the above should read: "Or, if you want check constraints". Not null constraints are always copied, and inclu

Re: [BUGS] BUG #5719: Constraint Problem

2010-10-21 Thread Alex Hunsaker
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 03:05, KOTAPATI.KRISHNAIAH wrote: > > The following bug has been logged online: > > Bug reference:      5719 > Logged by:          KOTAPATI.KRISHNAIAH > Email address:      kotapati.kris...@hotmail.com > PostgreSQL version: PostgreSQL8.3.1 > Operating system:   Microsoft Wi

Re: [BUGS] BUG #5704: not correct restrictions plperlu

2010-10-13 Thread Alex Hunsaker
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 10:34, Robert Haas wrote: > On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 4:24 PM, Igor wrote: >> PostgreSQL version: 8.1 >> Operating system:   CentOs 5 >> Description:        not correct  restrictions plperlu >> Details: >> >> rights of functions on plperlu >> lower than the user postgres >>

Re: [BUGS] BUG #5692: fatal error

2010-10-04 Thread Alex Hunsaker
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 11:59, V.J. wrote: > * Starting PostgreSQL 8.4 database server >                      * The PostgreSQL server failed to start. Please check > the log output: > 2010-10-04 19:58:40 CEST FATAL:  konnte auf private Schl?sseldatei >>>server.key<< nicht zugreifen: No such file o

Re: [BUGS] Exclude constraint problem

2010-09-01 Thread Alex Zepeda
hanks for doing all of that leg work. Whinging has commenced. - alex -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs

Re: [BUGS] Exclude constraint problem

2010-08-30 Thread Alex Zepeda
Tom Lane wrote: Alex Zepeda writes: I'd be happy to provide someone with a copy of the dump... but it's ~70MB bzip'd. I'd be willing to take a look ... but if my WAG is right, the insertion order would be critical information to reproduce the problem. Is it possible to

Re: [BUGS] Exclude constraint problem

2010-08-30 Thread Alex Zepeda
Tom Lane wrote: Alex Zepeda writes: If I try to manually add the constraint on the table I get: blockface=# alter table bus_positions add constraint "exclude_time_buffer" EXCLUDE USING gist (vehicle WITH =, buffer_time WITH &&, bbox_dup WITH &&); NOTICE: ALTER TABLE

Re: [BUGS] Exclude constraint problem

2010-08-30 Thread Alex Zepeda
3576E5424016FBCBEEC9995EC0B6F3FDD478E5424088A2409FC8995EC0B6F3FDD478E5424088A2409FC8995EC09A42E73576E5424016FBCBEEC9995EC09A42E73576E54240'::geometry AS geom_intersect; period_intersect | geom_intersect --+ t | t (1 row) Another thing I stumble

[BUGS] Exclude constraint problem

2010-08-30 Thread Alex Zepeda
ns. bbox_dup is a geometry column containing a polygon. - alex -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs

Re: [BUGS] BUG #5601: cannot create language plperl;

2010-08-10 Thread Alex Hunsaker
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 01:30, Rene Novotny wrote: > Thank's a lot > > with  Activestate 64 bit perl 5.10 it works. > > It would be very desirable for plperl supporter to to add some plperl release > notes with Postgresql > production release for users to know , with what PERL distribution it work

Re: [BUGS] BUG #5605: round(attr_name,int) works bad

2010-08-06 Thread Alex Hunsaker
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 02:12, Adam Radlowski wrote: > PostgreSQL version: 8.4.4 > Operating system:   Gentoo 64 bit (PSQL 8.4.4), Fedora 12 32 bit (PSQL > 8.4.1) > select round(any_numeric_field*something,2) from any_table; > I get information, that the function dos not exist. Can we get the exa

Re: [HACKERS] Drop one-argument string_agg? (was Re: [BUGS] string_agg delimiter having no effect with order by)

2010-08-05 Thread Alex Hunsaker
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 12:25, Tom Lane wrote: > regression=# select string_agg(f1 order by f1, ',') from text_tbl; > ERROR:  function string_agg(text) does not exist > LINE 1: select string_agg(f1 order by f1, ',') from text_tbl; >               ^ > HINT:  No function matches the given name and ar

Re: [BUGS] BUG #5601: cannot create language plperl;

2010-08-05 Thread Alex Hunsaker
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 00:13, Rene Novotny wrote: > > The following bug has been logged online: > PostgreSQL version: 9.0 beta 4 > Operating system:   Win 7 64 bit > Description:        cannot create language plperl; > Details: > > ERROR: Could not load library > c:/Program Files/PostgreSQL/9.0/li

Re: [HACKERS] Drop one-argument string_agg? (was Re: [BUGS] string_agg delimiter having no effect with order by)

2010-08-04 Thread Alex Hunsaker
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 17:07, Tom Lane wrote: > Alex Hunsaker writes: >> I dunno about anyone else but (a, ',' order by a) just looks weird. > > I suppose, but aren't you just focusing on the argument being constant? Yes. >> Or in other words, any tho

Re: [HACKERS] Drop one-argument string_agg? (was Re: [BUGS] string_agg delimiter having no effect with order by)

2010-08-04 Thread Alex Hunsaker
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 16:33, Thom Brown wrote: > I was afraid that the function would be pulled completely, but from > looking at the patch, you're only removing the function with a > single-parameter signature, which is quite innocuous.  So I'm "for" > now. Ahh, Now I see why you were worried

Re: Drop one-argument string_agg? (was Re: [BUGS] string_agg delimiter having no effect with order by)

2010-08-04 Thread Alex Hunsaker
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 13:42, Tom Lane wrote: > Robert Haas writes: >> On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 3:25 PM, Alex Hunsaker wrote: >>> I think forcing an initdb might be more trouble than this wart is worth. > >> +1.  I would not make this change unless we have to force

Re: Drop one-argument string_agg? (was Re: [BUGS] string_agg delimiter having no effect with order by)

2010-08-04 Thread Alex Hunsaker
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 13:11, Tom Lane wrote: > Alex Hunsaker writes: >> On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 11:04, Tom Lane wrote: >>> If we were a bit earlier in the 9.0 cycle I would suggest that this >>> confusion is a sufficient reason to drop the one-argument form of >&g

Re: [BUGS] string_agg delimiter having no effect with order by

2010-08-04 Thread Alex Hunsaker
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 11:04, Tom Lane wrote: > If we were a bit earlier in the 9.0 cycle I would suggest that this > confusion is a sufficient reason to drop the one-argument form of > string_agg.  It's too late now though. FWIW I think we can still change it. Isn't this type of issue part of

Re: [BUGS] BUG #5598: Compatibility modes

2010-08-04 Thread Alex Hunsaker
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 10:42, Robert Haas wrote: > On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 10:53 AM, Shine wrote: >> We would like to know if there is a workaround built into postgres by >> setting some kind of COMPATIBILITY variable (similar to SQL SERVER 2005 / >> 2008)... > > Sorry, there is no such mode... H

Re: [BUGS] BUG #5585: SSL problems with long COPYs

2010-08-01 Thread Alex Hunsaker
On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 14:02, Karl Denninger wrote: > (Whether Postgress 9's internal replication will solve this for me when it > is released is something I'm not sure about - I think the answer is "no", > since if I'm reading the docs correctly Postgres 9 requires that both master > and slave b

Re: [BUGS] BUG #5585: SSL problems with long COPYs

2010-07-31 Thread Alex Hunsaker
On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 00:08, Karl Denninger wrote: > > The following bug has been logged online: > > Bug reference:      5585 > Logged by:          Karl Denninger > Email address:      k...@denninger.net > PostgreSQL version: 8.4.4 > Operating system:   FreeBSD 8.0 > Description:        SSL probl

Re: [BUGS] BUG #5578: postrgesql database crash

2010-07-30 Thread Alex Hunsaker
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 20:01, yhou wrote: > Operating system:   windows 2000 > My program will use postgresal database, after start my program ,I find it > hangs always, so I check the db log,and find these exception: > > 2010-07-27 14:08:22 EDT LOG:  loaded library > "$libdir/plugins/plugin_deb

Re: [BUGS] BUG #5571: global hash %_SHARED is not declared as global in the new version

2010-07-26 Thread Alex Hunsaker
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 03:58, mile wrote: > To reproduce this use the following function: > > create or replace function perl_shared() returns void as $$ > use strict; > elog(INFO, $_SHARED{'stuff'}); > $_SHARED{'stuff'} = '1'; > for my $k (keys %_SHARED) > { >    elog(INFO, $k); > } > $$ languag

Re: [BUGS] BUG #5563: Odd behavior with aggregate_func(DISTINCT foo ORDER BY foo)

2010-07-23 Thread Alex Hunsaker
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 12:19, Daniel Grace wrote: > Please see BUG #5564 -- I accidentally submitted this one before I was > finished typing the details. Ahh, sorry for the noise. I was just trolling for bug reports that had no replys yet :-) -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@po

Re: [BUGS] BUG #5563: Odd behavior with aggregate_func(DISTINCT foo ORDER BY foo)

2010-07-23 Thread Alex Hunsaker
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 18:04, Daniel Grace wrote: > However, in some circumstances Postgres will fail How exactly? this is what I get: => SELECT STRING_AGG(DISTINCT t::text order by t::text) FROM foo; string_agg abc (1 row) => SELECT STRING_AGG(DISTINCT t::text order by t::text

Re: [BUGS] BUG #5570: global hash %_SHARED does not work in the new version

2010-07-23 Thread Alex Hunsaker
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 10:17, Milen wrote: > > The following bug has been logged online: > > Bug reference:      5570 > Logged by:          Milen > Email address:      m...@avangardsolutions.com > PostgreSQL version: v9.0beta2 > Operating system:   Linux > Description:        global hash %_SHARED

Re: [BUGS] BUG #5567: will not install

2010-07-22 Thread Alex Hunsaker
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 11:21, Chris Browne wrote: >  2.  PostgreSQL Version 8.1 was the first version where AIX became >     sufficiently supported to allow it to be tested on a regular >     basis on the PostgreSQL Build Farm. >       http://pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_status.pl > >     There

Re: [BUGS] BUG #5567: will not install

2010-07-22 Thread Alex Hunsaker
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 11:51, Denise Kanyuh wrote: > > Alex, > Yes -- I am aware that we are on an old release -- > > when you say - my hunch is > > they do not ship binaries for AIX (7.1). > > > what binaries are you taking about --- we use the same installer

Re: [BUGS] BUG #5567: will not install

2010-07-22 Thread Alex Hunsaker
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 06:13, Denise Kanyuh wrote: > PostgreSQL version: 8.0.15 [ BTW the latest version of 8.0 is 8.0.25, also note 8.0 is getting EOL'ed within the next month or so, see http://www.postgresql.org/about/news.1214 ] > When trying to test our product which incorporates postgress

Re: [BUGS] BUG #5472: Postgres hard crash in ...WHERE IN (SELECT * FROM (VALUES (),...) AS t(col))

2010-05-25 Thread Alex Hunsaker
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 11:26, Alex Hunsaker wrote: > On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 10:39, Vlad Romascanu wrote: > >> The following reproducibly crashes Postgres 8.4.3 (segfault) inside >> int84eq() on both Windows and Linux, but works just fine in 8.3.4: > > Hrm... Both work

Re: [BUGS] BUG #5472: Postgres hard crash in ...WHERE IN (SELECT * FROM (VALUES (),...) AS t(col))

2010-05-25 Thread Alex Hunsaker
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 10:39, Vlad Romascanu wrote: > The following reproducibly crashes Postgres 8.4.3 (segfault) inside > int84eq() on both Windows and Linux, but works just fine in 8.3.4: Hrm... Both work for me (8.4.3 and 8.4.4). -- => SELECT col1, col2 FROM t1 WHERE col1 IN ( SELECT * FRO

Re: [BUGS] bool: symbol name collision

2010-05-11 Thread Alex Hunsaker
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 12:42, Robert Haas wrote: > I guess the question that comes to mind for me is how many other > things fall into this category.  We define a lot of symbols like int4 > and int32 that other people could also have defined, and I don't > really want to s/^/pg/ all of them.  If

[BUGS] BUG #5423: problems installing postgresql-8.4 deleted folder / .s.PGSQL.lock not initiate the connecti

2010-04-15 Thread Alex Soto Paez
The following bug has been logged online: Bug reference: 5423 Logged by: Alex Soto Paez Email address: alejandro.soto...@gmail.com PostgreSQL version: 8.4 Operating system: linux 9.10 Description:problems installing postgresql-8.4 deleted folder / .s.PGSQL.lock not

[BUGS] BUG #5422: problems installing postgresql-8.4 deleted folder / .s.PGSQL.lock not initinot initiate the connecti

2010-04-15 Thread Alex Soto Paez
The following bug has been logged online: Bug reference: 5422 Logged by: Alex Soto Paez Email address: alejandro.soto...@gmail.com PostgreSQL version: 8.4 Operating system: linux Description:problems installing postgresql-8.4 deleted folder / .s.PGSQL.lock not

[BUGS] BUG #5362: WARNING could not determine encoding

2010-03-04 Thread ALEX
The following bug has been logged online: Bug reference: 5362 Logged by: ALEX Email address: bav...@mail.ru PostgreSQL version: 8.3 Operating system: linux ubuntu 9.10 server Description:WARNING could not determine encoding Details: # sudo pg_createcluster -e koi8

Re: [BUGS] BUG #5352: Bug in PL/PgSQL "SELECT .. INTO" statement parser

2010-03-01 Thread Alex Hunsaker
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 02:22, Oleg wrote: > CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION "bug" () RETURNS pg_catalog.void AS > $body$ > DECLARE >   row_test1 test1%rowtype; >   row_test2 test2%rowtype; > BEGIN >   SELECT test1, chunk_id >       FROM test1 JOIN test2 ON(chunk.id = test2.chunk_id) >       LIMIT 1 >  

Re: [BUGS] New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0)

2010-02-25 Thread Alex Hunsaker
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 14:06, David E. Wheeler wrote: > On Feb 25, 2010, at 12:58 PM, Tim Bunce wrote: >> There is one fairly good answer: >> >> Use a perl that's compiled to support multiplicity but not threads. > That solves the problem with recursion or with $a and $b or both? Yes ATM becaus

Re: [BUGS] New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0)

2010-02-25 Thread Alex Hunsaker
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 13:03, Alex Hunsaker wrote: > On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 12:59, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote: >> Just don't break anything in 9.0 that relies on plperl please. :) To that >> end, let me know when HEAD has something somewhat stable, and I'll >>

Re: [BUGS] New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0)

2010-02-25 Thread Alex Hunsaker
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 12:59, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote: > Just don't break anything in 9.0 that relies on plperl please. :) To that > end, let me know when HEAD has something somewhat stable, and I'll > run some tests against it (e.g. Bucardo, which uses lots of plperl) Defiantly, the goal is t

Re: [BUGS] New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0)

2010-02-25 Thread Alex Hunsaker
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 12:31, David E. Wheeler wrote: > I think Tom meant, what sorts of changes to PostgreSQL do you think might > solve the problem? Here is what Tim said: >Doesn't seem too icky. Basically plperl would need to save the values of >PL_defstash, PL_incgv and PL_op_mask when a pl

Re: [BUGS] New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0)

2010-02-25 Thread Alex Hunsaker
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 12:20, Tom Lane wrote: > Alex Hunsaker writes: >> 3) patch postgres to fix the recursive issue (What I'm leaning towards) >> [ fixes both issues ] > > How exactly would you propose doing that? Well that's the thing, probably by what I d

Re: [BUGS] New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0)

2010-02-25 Thread Alex Hunsaker
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 11:04, David E. Wheeler wrote: > There seem to be no good answers here. Yeah, Here is the thing I don't think we can fix 'safe' or even patch perl to get recursive calls to work. Maybe Tim sees a way? We can work around it in 9.0 with plperl.on_init. But breaking the ba

Re: [BUGS] New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0)

2010-02-24 Thread Alex Hunsaker
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 22:01, Alex Hunsaker wrote: > Ok I can get behind this.  I did some testing and we could probably > even store less than than that if we could do the equivalent of: > Safe->share('::mksafefunc'); > pl_perl_createsub() > Safe->unshare('

Re: [BUGS] New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0)

2010-02-24 Thread Alex Hunsaker
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 15:54, Tim Bunce wrote: > Doesn't seem too icky. Basically plperl would need to save the values of > PL_defstash, PL_incgv and PL_op_mask when a plperl interpreter is > initialized.  And then local()'ly restore them in the plperl entry points. > Should only be a few lines o

Re: [BUGS] New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0)

2010-02-24 Thread Alex Hunsaker
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 20:37, Alex Hunsaker wrote: > On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 20:19, Tom Lane wrote: >> Seems entirely unacceptable. > I think we will see if we can get this fixed on the Safe/perl side then. BTW the trade off here is we revert back to sort { $a <=> $b } not

Re: [BUGS] New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0)

2010-02-24 Thread Alex Hunsaker
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 20:19, Tom Lane wrote: >What you're saying, IIUC, is > that if function A calls function B via a SPI command, and B wasn't > executed previously in the current session, it would fail?  Seems > entirely unacceptable. Yep, thats right :(. Thanks, thats exactly the kind of f

Re: [BUGS] New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0)

2010-02-24 Thread Alex Hunsaker
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 19:17, Alex Hunsaker wrote: > On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 15:23, Tim Bunce wrote: > >> I believe (but haven't yet confirmed) that the problem here is recursion. >> This affects all versions of PostgreSQL. > Ill keep digging. Ok I understand now, ba

Re: [BUGS] New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0)

2010-02-24 Thread Alex Hunsaker
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 15:23, Tim Bunce wrote: > I believe (but haven't yet confirmed) that the problem here is recursion. > This affects all versions of PostgreSQL. Hrm... This seems to work for me in HEAD. It certainly breaks in 8.3. Am I missing something? $ bin/psql postgres psql (9

Re: [BUGS] BUG #5339: Version of Perl detected incorrectly

2010-02-22 Thread Alex Hunsaker
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 00:50, Alex Hunsaker wrote: > On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 14:31, Tom Lane wrote: >> I'm inclined to stay with the same basic >> implementation and just hack up the regexp some more to cope with 5.11's >> more verbose -v output. > > And h

Re: [BUGS] BUG #5339: Version of Perl detected incorrectly

2010-02-22 Thread Alex Hunsaker
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 14:31, Tom Lane wrote: > I'm inclined to stay with the same basic > implementation and just hack up the regexp some more to cope with 5.11's > more verbose -v output. And here is a stab at that: $ echo "This is perl, version 4.0" | sed -n 's/This is perl.*v[a-z ]*\([0-9]\.

Re: [BUGS] BUG #5339: Version of Perl detected incorrectly

2010-02-22 Thread Alex Hunsaker
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 14:31, Tom Lane wrote: > Alex Hunsaker writes: >> How about something like the below? > > I still think that this is optimizing the wrong thing.  We care about > the clarity of the message the user sees, not about how short or clean > the Perl code

Re: [BUGS] BUG #5339: Version of Perl detected incorrectly

2010-02-22 Thread Alex Hunsaker
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 14:17, Alex Hunsaker wrote: > On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 13:07, Tom Lane wrote: >> Alex Hunsaker writes: >>> !   perl_version_error=`$PERL -e 'use 5.00801;' 2>&1` ... > How about something like the below? Find attached on

Re: [BUGS] BUG #5339: Version of Perl detected incorrectly

2010-02-22 Thread Alex Hunsaker
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 13:07, Tom Lane wrote: > Alex Hunsaker writes: >> !   perl_version_error=`$PERL -e 'use 5.00801;' 2>&1` > > This is not a path towards an acceptable solution, as it effectively > assumes what we are setting out to prove, namely that

Re: [BUGS] BUG #5339: Version of Perl detected incorrectly

2010-02-22 Thread Alex Hunsaker
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 12:44, Alex Hunsaker wrote: > On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 10:57, Jonathan wrote: >> configure: using perl >> configure: WARNING: >> *** The installed version of Perl, /home/leto/bin/perl, is too old to use >> with PostgreSQL. >> *** Perl vers

  1   2   >