On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 12:42, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > I guess the question that comes to mind for me is how many other > things fall into this category. We define a lot of symbols like int4 > and int32 that other people could also have defined, and I don't > really want to s/^/pg/ all of them. If it's really only a question of > renaming bool I could see doing it.
You mean i'd get the pleasure of 'fixing' all my 3rd party C modules? Not that that is a huge problem, we have broken calling conventions in most releases... -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
