On 11/03/2012 01:22 AM, gryphons...@gmail.com wrote:
> The following bug has been logged on the website:
>
> Bug reference: 7638
> Logged by: shawn darling
> Email address: gryphons...@gmail.com
> PostgreSQL version: 9.0.0
> Operating system: windows 7
> Description:
>
191Gb ?? wow .. what do you have in there ??
PostGreSQL .. is another database system
-Jeff Lake
MichiganWxSystem.com
AllisonHouse.com
TheWeatherCenter.net
GRLevelXStuff.com
On 11/2/2012 13:22, gryphons...@gmail.com wrote:
The following bug has been logged on the website:
Bug reference:
The following bug has been logged on the website:
Bug reference: 7638
Logged by: shawn darling
Email address: gryphons...@gmail.com
PostgreSQL version: 9.0.0
Operating system: windows 7
Description:
I need to know can i get rid of it or what is it even for? how do I a
Thomas Eckestad writes:
> 2012/11/1 Tom Lane
>> That is extremely peculiar --- AFAICS, 9.1 should never assign a
>> relfilenode of 12693.
> I am afraid that I can not guarantee that the example that I posted
> (global/12693) was triggered with version 9.1.6. It might be for 9.0.x or
> 9.1.x, if
The following bug has been logged on the website:
Bug reference: 7637
Logged by: abaile
Email address: abail...@aol.com
PostgreSQL version: 9.2.1
Operating system: rhel6.1
Description:
Im trying to install postgres 9.2 on rhel6.1 and it gives me the error
'postgres92-
2012/11/1 Tom Lane
>
> That is extremely peculiar --- AFAICS, 9.1 should never assign a
> relfilenode of 12693. (OIDs assigned by initdb don't get past about
> 11900 in that version, and OIDs assigned after normal postmaster start
> should always be above 16384.) Is it always exactly "global/12
Hi Tom and everyone,
> Seems like that is a bug to file with IBM.
We did this 8 months ago, and we got a patch for the problem yesterday. As
far as we can see it's really fixed - I only tested it with the showcase
we built to convince IBM that there really is a problem, I haven't tried
yet with
