Craig,
Thanks. I assume you mean this one?
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-07/msg01419.php
I'll check with them to see if its okay if we give this a try.
Thanks,
Regina
-Original Message-
From: Craig Ringer [mailto:cr...@postnewspapers.com.au]
Sent: Tuesday, August
On mån, 2009-08-24 at 19:56 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera writes:
> > Personally I still think debbugs would suit us perfectly, but 1. I don't
> > have time to handle it, 2. nobody else believes this, 3. the debbugs
> > developers are not very interested in helping us use it.
>
> What i
On Tuesday, August 25, 2009, Craig Ringer wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-08-25 at 05:44 +, Regina wrote:
>> The following bug has been logged online:
>>
>> Bug reference: 5007
>> Logged by: Regina
>> Email address: �...@pcorp.us
>> PostgreSQL version: 8.3.6
>> Operating system: Wind
On Tue, 2009-08-25 at 05:44 +, Regina wrote:
> The following bug has been logged online:
>
> Bug reference: 5007
> Logged by: Regina
> Email address: l...@pcorp.us
> PostgreSQL version: 8.3.6
> Operating system: Windows 2008 Server Standard
> Description:could not
The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 5007
Logged by: Regina
Email address: l...@pcorp.us
PostgreSQL version: 8.3.6
Operating system: Windows 2008 Server Standard
Description:could not reattach to shared memory
Details:
One of our clients is getti
Alvaro Herrera writes:
> Personally I still think debbugs would suit us perfectly, but 1. I don't
> have time to handle it, 2. nobody else believes this, 3. the debbugs
> developers are not very interested in helping us use it.
What is it that we'd need their help for?
re
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 11:38 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On mån, 2009-08-24 at 23:07 +0100, Greg Stark wrote:
>> I think it's a conceit to think we always fix bugs immediately.
>
> I completely agree with that one. The claim that we don't need a bug
> tracker because most bugs get fixed immedia
On mån, 2009-08-24 at 23:07 +0100, Greg Stark wrote:
> I think it's a conceit to think we always fix bugs immediately.
I completely agree with that one. The claim that we don't need a bug
tracker because most bugs get fixed immediately is bogus because a) it's
not true, and b) it doesn't help peo
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 10:16 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>
> Well, all you'd really need is that if you close a bug, you indicate
> that say via an email header
>
> X-PG-Bugs-Close: 12345
>
> and then spice up the archives display to show that somehow. But the
> chances of getting people to use t
On mån, 2009-08-24 at 20:10 +0100, Greg Stark wrote:
> It's completely email based so we could just treat it as a mailing
> list without having to go visit a web interface to stay up to date. We
> could add CVS/whatever hooks so whenever a commit message says it
> closes a bug it gets closed automa
Robert Haas writes:
> ... It seems to me based on my short
> tenure reading this mailing list that when someone provides a
> reproducible test case of Postgres verifiably DTWT it usually attracts
> plenty of attention and gets dealt with relatively quickly, usually
> with a friendly "thanks for t
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 3:10 PM, Greg Stark wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 8:03 PM, Alvaro
> Herrera wrote:
>> Personally I still think debbugs would suit us perfectly, but 1. I don't
>> have time to handle it, 2. nobody else believes this, 3. the debbugs
>> developers are not very interested in
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 8:03 PM, Alvaro
Herrera wrote:
> Personally I still think debbugs would suit us perfectly, but 1. I don't
> have time to handle it, 2. nobody else believes this, 3. the debbugs
> developers are not very interested in helping us use it.
I've been shouting about debbugs forev
Robert Haas escribió:
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 8:24 AM, Brian
> Ceccarelli wrote:
> > Yes. I understand. It has all to do with Unicode collating sequence. I
> > need to somehow remove this bug from the list, since it is not a bug.
>
> Heh. As far as I understand, there is no list... one th
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 8:24 AM, Brian
Ceccarelli wrote:
> Yes. I understand. It has all to do with Unicode collating sequence. I
> need to somehow remove this bug from the list, since it is not a bug.
Heh. As far as I understand, there is no list... one thing that I
have been worrying abou
Andrew Gierth writes:
> "Greg" == Greg Stark writes:
> Greg> Either of two things are true.
> Greg> Either transaction 6179 committed,
> [snip]
> This is all missing the point. The row should have been killed by
> transaction 4971, NOT 6179. By the time transaction 6179 tried to
> do anything
"Miroslav Trisc" writes:
> My select : select * from wms_shp_delivery where id in (
> select shp_delivery_id from wms_shp_bins
> where edi_id='5452'
> )
> caused that Postgre server completely crash.
We can't really do anything about this without a reproducible test case,
whic
The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 5006
Logged by: Miroslav Trisc
Email address: miro.tr...@swissonline.ch
PostgreSQL version: 8.4.0
Operating system: Windows Server 2003 R2 service pack 2
Description:Backend crashed after select with subselect i
Yes. I understand. It has all to do with Unicode collating sequence. I
need to somehow remove this bug from the list, since it is not a bug.
-Original Message-
From: pgsql-bugs-ow...@postgresql.org
[mailto:pgsql-bugs-ow...@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Peter Eisentraut
Sent: Monday, Au
On 22/08/2009 19:52, hubert depesz lubaczewski wrote:
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 04:26:11PM +, Sebastien Lardiere wrote:
The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 5004
Logged by: Sebastien Lardiere
Email address: slardi...@hi-media.com
PostgreSQL version:
On 21/08/2009 18:51, Tom Lane wrote:
"Sebastien Lardiere" writes:
Description:pg_freespacemap make a SegFault
There's a post-8.3.7 fix that might cure this:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2009-04/msg00108.php
regards, tom lane
On tor, 2009-08-20 at 20:24 +, Brian Ceccarelli wrote:
> since the < and > comparison operators seem to be case insensitive:
>
> select 'a' < 'Z';-- true
> select 'a' < 'z';-- true
> select 'A' < 'Z';-- true
> select 'A' < 'z';-- true
>
> select 'z' < 'A';-- false
> select
22 matches
Mail list logo
