Robert Haas escribió: > On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 8:24 AM, Brian > Ceccarelli<cecca...@talusmusic.com> wrote: > > Yes. I understand. It has all to do with Unicode collating sequence. I > > need to somehow remove this bug from the list, since it is not a bug. > > Heh. As far as I understand, there is no list... one thing that I > have been worrying about is the lack of any apparent mechanism to make > sure that every bug report gets a response, even if the response is > just "this is not a bug" or "you didn't provide enough detail" or "go > file this bug against the correct product".
Bruce used to say proudly that we didn't need a bugtracker because *he* was the bugtracker. Back in those days he had a lot more time to keep on top of his PG mailbox. Today it is seeming like we need something better. Something simple though, because the previous discussions involving bugzilla led nowhere (or actually -- they led us right back where we started). Personally I still think debbugs would suit us perfectly, but 1. I don't have time to handle it, 2. nobody else believes this, 3. the debbugs developers are not very interested in helping us use it. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
