David Fetter wrote:
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 11:51:49AM -0700, austijc wrote:
That's going to be a problem for the continued viability of
Postgres.
Funny, I thought running a DBMS over a known-unreliable storage system
was a problem for the continued viability of Oracle. When, not if,
people l
Okay, I see the maturity level is too low here. I'll take this elsewhere.
If anyone has a similar problem and would like to know the status please
email me.
David Fetter wrote:
>
> On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 11:51:49AM -0700, austijc wrote:
>>
>> That's going to be a problem for the continued
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 11:51:49AM -0700, austijc wrote:
>
> That's going to be a problem for the continued viability of
> Postgres.
Funny, I thought running a DBMS over a known-unreliable storage system
was a problem for the continued viability of Oracle. When, not if,
people lose enough data t
The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 4440
Logged by: Steve Jones
Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PostgreSQL version: V8.1.4
Operating system: Windows XP + sp3
Description:positioned_load in pos_newload failed
Details:
I have an issue using the f