Guillaume Smet wrote:
On 4/11/07, Devrim GÜNDÜZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, 2007-03-02 at 09:17 -0800, John R Pierce wrote:
> looks like the RPMs for libpq.so.4 and libpq.so.3 can't coexist.
Ok, I got lots of complaints about this. I will work on this today and
announce new sets.
It's
Devrim GÜNDÜZ wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 01:10 -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
well, it makes it VERY hard to install 8.2.3 on a RHEL4/CentOS4 system
that also has, say, RH's build of Apache + PHP + PG access, as thats
linked to the -3 libraries
Uh? So installing only compat-3 and
Guillaume Smet wrote:
But you only need the compat package with libpq.so.3 to install 8.1
and 8.2 on RHEL 4.
but, again, I only see the compat -4 here... no -3.
http://www.postgresql.org/ftp/binary/v8.2.3/linux/rpms/redhat/rhel-es-4/
the 8.2.1 equiv of that path has a comment thats flat wr
On Wed, 11 Apr 2007, Tom Lane wrote:
It's not really possible to use it "incorrectly", AFAICS. Any value you
might pass to it will result in a specific new seed value. Nowhere is
there any guarantee of what the mapping is, and it's obviously
impossible to guarantee that the mapping is one-to
Kris Jurka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, 11 Apr 2007, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Kris Jurka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> Why doesn't setseed complain when given a seed value outside of its
>>> expected range?
>>
>> Why should it complain? The use of the value is totally unspecified
>> anyway.
On Wed, 11 Apr 2007, Tom Lane wrote:
Kris Jurka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Why doesn't setseed complain when given a seed value outside of its
expected range?
Why should it complain? The use of the value is totally unspecified
anyway.
Because the user is likely using it incorrectly. I
Kris Jurka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Why doesn't setseed complain when given a seed value outside of its
> expected range?
Why should it complain? The use of the value is totally unspecified
anyway.
regards, tom lane
---(end of broadcast)
On 4/11/07, John R Pierce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think what -I- ran into was that there was no compat-3 in the public
repositories, just compat-4... this was about a month ago. devrim
indicated he was going to upload compat-3, and showed me where to find
it, but I'd already installed compa
Why doesn't setseed complain when given a seed value outside of its
expected range? The documentation claims that 0 -> 1 should be used,
but shouldn't it actually be -1 -> 1 to get the full range of the seed?
If passed a value outside this range you always get the same value which
isn't goin
Hi,
On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 01:10 -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
> well, it makes it VERY hard to install 8.2.3 on a RHEL4/CentOS4 system
> that also has, say, RH's build of Apache + PHP + PG access, as thats
> linked to the -3 libraries
Uh? So installing only compat-3 and PostgreSQL 8.2.3 doesn't wo
On 4/11/07, Devrim GÜNDÜZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, 2007-03-02 at 09:17 -0800, John R Pierce wrote:
> looks like the RPMs for libpq.so.4 and libpq.so.3 can't coexist.
Ok, I got lots of complaints about this. I will work on this today and
announce new sets.
It's not a real problem IMHO
11 matches
Mail list logo
