Re: [BUGS] BUG #1008: fe-misc.c has an ifdef for HAVE_POLL, should be HAVE_POLL_H

2003-12-15 Thread Tom Lane
"Peter Herndon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> [ is not present in an OS X 10.3 installation ] > *sheepishly* It looks like it would be the option of, well, installing > DevTools for 10.3 or not... From the looks of it, I never installed > the 10.3 DevTools on the laptop. The 10.2 tools were

Re: [BUGS] netmask(inet) function broken in 7.4

2003-12-15 Thread Bruce Momjian
This will be fixed in 7.4.1. --- Joe Sunday wrote: > > > POSTGRESQL BUG REPORT TEMPLATE >

Re: [BUGS] BUG #1008: fe-misc.c has an ifdef for HAVE_POLL, should be HAVE_POLL_H

2003-12-15 Thread Tom Lane
"PostgreSQL Bugs List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Description:fe-misc.c has an ifdef for HAVE_POLL, should be HAVE_POLL_H That's entirely wrong. The configure code sets up two configuration symbols: HAVE_POLL_H indicates whether the header exists, while HAVE_POLL indicates whether the

[BUGS] BUG #1008: fe-misc.c has an ifdef for HAVE_POLL, should be HAVE_POLL_H

2003-12-15 Thread PostgreSQL Bugs List
The following bug has been logged online: Bug reference: 1008 Logged by: Peter Herndon Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PostgreSQL version: 7.4 Operating system: Mac OS X 10.3.1 Description:fe-misc.c has an ifdef for HAVE_POLL, should be HAVE_POLL_H Details: With st

Re: [BUGS] BUG #1006: information schema constraint information.

2003-12-15 Thread Tom Lane
Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> But if I read SQL99 correctly, only referencing not referenced >> columns are supposed to be shown. > It is supposed to show the referenced (primary key) columns. [ reads spec more carefully... ] Yeah, I think you are right. We ar

Re: [BUGS] BUG #1006: information schema constraint information.

2003-12-15 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Tom Lane wrote: > If the view were also supposed to show referenced columns, then I > think we'd need an additional UNION arm that joined on confrelid and > confkey[] instead of conrelid/conkey[]. But if I read SQL99 > correctly, only referencing not referenced columns are supposed to be > shown.