Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> But if I read SQL99 correctly, only referencing not referenced
>> columns are supposed to be shown.
> It is supposed to show the referenced (primary key) columns.
[ reads spec more carefully... ] Yeah, I think you are right.
We are going to need a separate UNION arm for the foreign-key case.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
