On 05/06/14 23:14, Matthew Knepley wrote:
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 12:56 AM, Adrian Croucher
mailto:a.crouc...@auckland.ac.nz>> wrote:
OK, I found one way around this- if in test.F90 I replace
Can you try just using the finclude/petscdef.h90 headers in the module?
Aha, yes that does work
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 12:56 AM, Adrian Croucher
wrote:
> OK, I found one way around this- if in test.F90 I replace
>
Can you try just using the finclude/petscdef.h90 headers in the module?
Thanks,
Matt
> use my_module
>
> with
>
> use my_module, only : foo
>
> it works.
>
> I'm n
OK, I found one way around this- if in test.F90 I replace
use my_module
with
use my_module, only : foo
it works.
I'm not sure how practical that's going to be with real code though
(e.g. a big module and I want to use lots of things in it). Are there
any better ways?
- Adrian
--
Dr A
hi
I'm having trouble compiling a PETSc Fortran program, which uses a
Fortran module in a separate file, which itself uses PETSc.
Here's a fairly minimal example of the problem.
Main program test.F90:
---
program test
use my_module
implicit none
#include
PetscInt :: bar = 2
print *
