On 05/06/14 23:14, Matthew Knepley wrote:
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 12:56 AM, Adrian Croucher <a.crouc...@auckland.ac.nz <mailto:a.crouc...@auckland.ac.nz>> wrote:

    OK, I found one way around this- if in test.F90 I replace


Can you try just using the finclude/petscdef.h90 headers in the module?

Aha, yes that does work too (at least, petscdef.h rather than petscdef.h90). Thanks!

Cheers, Adrian

--
Dr Adrian Croucher
Senior Research Fellow
Department of Engineering Science
University of Auckland, New Zealand
email: a.crouc...@auckland.ac.nz
tel: +64 (0)9 923 4611

Reply via email to