e made it until then, I'll do.
But it would be shame to wait that long ;-)
Cheers,
Moritz
;The Parrot
Foundation".
But from chromatic's response I learned that there is good way to support
parrot - but financing him for month.
So where is the problem? Why doesn't the money flow one way or another?
Does TPF want to sponsor more Perl 5 related development? Or was that
offer, $5k for 1 month full time hacking, not known before?
Moritz
d like to have a variable
instead ;-)
Moritz
ication as ("blue", "light", "hayard",) would
make much more sense, because simple thing like
@a.push eval(@b.perl)
would then DWIM.
Chhers,
Moritz
>>>>>> "m" == moritz writes:
>
> m> S02 says:
>
> m> "To get a Perlish representation of any object, use the .perl method.
> Like
> m> the Data::Dumper module in Perl 5, the .perl method will put quotes
> around
> m> s
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
That
seems more reasonable, because the command line arguments are stored in
@*ARGS.
I can't answer your question, sorry ;-).
Moritz
--
Moritz Lenz
http://moritz.faui2k3.org/ - http://sudokugarden.de/ - http://perl-6.de/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi,
brian d foy wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Moritz Lenz
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> brian d foy wrote:
>>> Under the section "The for Statement" in S04, it says that the diamond
>>> operator
>>&
Hi,
brian d foy wrote:
> At the moment the file test operators that I expect to return true or
> false do, but the true is the filename.
that helps chaining of file test:
$fn ~~ :t ~~ :x
or something.
If you want a boolean, use
? $fn ~~ :x
or something.
HTH,
Moritz
--
Moritz Len
n code here
Don't get me wrong, there's nothing bad in writing some critics, but
yours is impossible to realize in Perl 6, and therefore are it's hard to
call it constructive.
Cheers,
Moritz
--
Moritz Lenz
http://moritz.faui2k3.org/ | http://perl-6.de/
o implementation will ever finish.
I don't think most of are not open to new point of views, but regard p6
they just don't help atm.
Moritz
--
Moritz Lenz
http://moritz.faui2k3.org/ | http://perl-6.de/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Thomas Wittek wrote:
> Moritz Lenz schrieb:
>>> What makes Perl hard to read is the excessive use of special characters
>>> (/\W/).
>>
>> I disagree: The make it look ugly, but not hard to read.
>
> Even if it's "only" ugly: To what advantage
Moritz Lenz wrote:
> Thomas Wittek wrote:
>> Moritz Lenz schrieb:
>>>> I would also like semicolons to be optional.
>>> Most people don't ;-).
>> Oh, really? Source? :)
>
> I paraphrased Larry Wall. Iirc it was "everybody wants the semicol
ass and
document it properly. I'm sure you'll end up doing the same as I did.
ATM I don't know that should be implemented, but perhaps somebody else
can think of a good way.
--
Moritz Lenz
http://moritz.faui2k3.org/ | http://perl-6.de/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Thomas Wittek wrote:
> Moritz Lenz:
>> =begin pod
>>
>> =head3 C
>> [..]
>> =end pod
>>
>> method from_string(Str $s){
>> # implementation of that method here
>> }
>>
>> Since method signatures are very expressive in
rpreter/compiler rather hard - why should we stop with this
philosophy when talking about POD and POD-Parser?
I'd find it very annoying to have lines starting with '=' in a heredoc
beeing counted as POD. Humans don't think in terms of lines, but in
terms of visual blocks (at leas
rl.org/perl6/doc is very low.
I'd suggest something beneath <http://svn.pugscode.org/pugs/docs/>,
perhaps essentials/
Moritz
--
Moritz Lenz
http://moritz.faui2k3.org/ | http://perl-6.de/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
rl.org/perl6/doc is very low.
I'd suggest something beneath <http://svn.pugscode.org/pugs/docs/>,
perhaps essentials/
Moritz
--
Moritz Lenz
http://moritz.faui2k3.org/ | http://perl-6.de/
> language !
You could help by contributing some suggestions to what the new "Web"
module should be able to do, and how so. Web is hopefully "CGI done
right", and still in its early planning stage.
Cheers,
Moritz
--
Moritz Lenz
http://moritz.faui2k3.org/ | http://perl-6.de/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ould be changed to some extents.
You should discuss that on p5p, not here. Only Perl 6 is on topic here.
> Is there a place where we can add suggestions ? apart from the first one in...
> 2003 ? 4 years ago ?
You can write them here on p6l.
--
Moritz Lenz
http://moritz.faui2k3.
Smylers wrote:
> Moritz Lenz writes:
>
>> You could help by contributing some suggestions to what the new "Web"
>> module should be able to do, and how so. Web is hopefully "CGI done
>> right", and still in its early planning stage.
>
> Web modu
en't read enough real
Perl 6 that is annotated with Pod 6.
So everybody reading this is now condemned to write an OO Perl 6 module,
and document it with Pod 6 ;-)
--
Moritz Lenz
http://moritz.faui2k3.org/ | http://perl-6.de/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
me sort of constaint on the return value that
> they wouldn't want exceptional values.
return a native type?
--
Moritz Lenz
http://moritz.faui2k3.org/ | http://perl-6.de/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
rrency.pod
(still a draft) contains a bit more helpful information.
> Hopefully I'm not inadvertently starting any kind of flame-fest
> about anyone's favorite concurrency model here :-D
Why flame, when we can have all of them at once? ;-)
Moritz
--
Moritz Lenz
http://moritz.faui2k3.org/ | http://perl-6.de/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
inferred from data dependencies.
I think that the concurrency synopsis is still useful for explicit
threading, STM and the like.
Also note that Perl 6 tries to preserver Perl's soul, and is not an
Erlang based language ;-)
Cheers,
Moritz
--
Moritz Lenz
http://moritz.faui2k3.org/ | http://perl-6.de/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
right string is longer than the left one, the remaining characters
my $str = "määh";
$str =~ s:bb/.*/mo i/;
is $str now 'mö i' ? Or does the space get a \N{COMBINING DIAERESIS}? Or
is it tranlated to \N{DIAERESIS}? What about other non-letter characters?
--
Moritz Lenz
http://moritz.faui2k3.org/ | http://perl-6.de/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
I noticed that many test files contain "old" POD like this:
=pod
some description here
=cut
Should that all be replaced by the new POD?
=begin description
text here
=end description
--
Moritz Lenz
http://moritz.faui2k3.org/ | http://perl-6.de/
signature.asc
Descriptio
10n:en (or whatever) receives a list of pairs of
strings and variables to interpolate, ['$m' => $m, '\s' => undef].
It can then decide what to do with it.
Wait, that smells like macros, which are already specced - so never mind ;-)
Moritz
--
Moritz Lenz
http://moritz.faui2k3.org/ | http://perl-6.de/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
this has been proposed and rejected before, please just tell me, I'm
only following Perl 6 development for about a year).
Cheers,
Moritz
--
Moritz Lenz
http://moritz.faui2k3.org/ | http://perl-6.de/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
subversion aka svn.
The parrot repo contains parrot, rakudo (perl6 on parrot) and various
other languages, the pugs repo contains pugs, STD.pm (the grammar), some
of synopsis (in docs/Perl6/Spec/), kp6 (in v6/v6-KindaPerl6), smop (in
v6/smop/) and various other stuff.
Cheers,
Moritz
--
Moritz Le
John M. Dlugosz wrote:
> I'm taking a stab at turning the S\d\d documents into a formal standard.
That's certainly a nice idea, and much work. ++ for taking it.
Cheers,
Moritz
--
Moritz Lenz
http://moritz.faui2k3.org/ | http://perl-6.de/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Technically the Cartesian cross operator doesn't have an identity value.
It has.
The set which contains only the emty set, or in perl terms ([]);
Or am I missing something?
Cheers,
Moritz
--
Moritz Lenz
http://moritz.faui2k3.org/ | http://perl-6.de/
signa
dtional methods:
class MyMath {
method can_take_sqrt($x:){
$x >= 0;
}
method sqrt($x:){
PRE { $x.can_take_sqrt }
...
}
}
class MyComplexMath is MyMath {
method can_take_sqrt($x:){
True
}
...
}
That way a user of class MyMath can always cal
stating that type information is
determined at compile time, which seems like an optimization to me that
doesn't need to be in perl 6.0.0. Of course any implementer is welcome
to do perform that optimization where possible ;-)
Moritz
--
Moritz Lenz
http://moritz.faui2k3.org/ | http://perl-6.de/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
John M. Dlugosz wrote:
> Moritz Lenz moritz-at-casella.verplant.org |Perl 6| wrote:
>>
>> This is described in depth in "Object oriented software construction" by
>> Bertrand Meyer.
>>
>>
> OK, reading about it in Wiki, I see what it's suppose
John M. Dlugosz wrote:
> Moritz Lenz moritz-at-casella.verplant.org |Perl 6| wrote:
>> John M. Dlugosz wrote:
>>
>>> I posted my current work at
>>> http://www.dlugosz.com/files/specdoc.pdf
>>> and .odt.
>>>
>>
>> 3.1.1
ng for. Thanks.
>
> Makes you wonder why the 'given' keyword was added, when for/when is so
> close...
I'd assume 'given' provides scalar context onto its argument, 'for'
obviously provides list context.
But I guess the main difference is that &
f you leave off the optional 'my' or 'our'
> that it defaults to 'my', or should it be 'our' like everything else?
>
> --John
--
Moritz Lenz
http://moritz.faui2k3.org/ | http://perl-6.de/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
method !foo ...
my method foo ... # same, but &foo is aliased to &!foo
Am I right in assuming that the second example is valid only for roles?
I find this different syntax for classes and roles quite confusing. Is
it intended that way? I'd welcome a uniform syntax.
C
because
the lexical scoping of the 'my' is orthogonal to the scope of the class.
class A {
my method foo { }
}
class A is also {
method bar {
# no way to access self!foo here
}
}
So is
our method !foo {}
allowed in classes? and is it the recommended way t
with empty arguments? (or do
exceptions ignore POST blocks anyway?)
Cheers,
Moritz
--
Moritz Lenz
http://moritz.faui2k3.org/ | http://perl-6.de/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Ryan Richter wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 12:03:00PM +0200, Moritz Lenz wrote:
>> My last successful build was r18093 with GHC 6.6.1.
>> Maybe we should just die in Makefile.PL until somebody finds a fix.
>
> Maybe we should just revert the pugs source to t
d, optional argument which specifies the
operation mode? Or are they both "dump", and the regex engine does the
mapping from smart to dump itself?
Anyway, S29 needs clarification.
BTW the naming seems inconsistent to me: same*case* preserves *case*,
but same*base* preserves *
get declarative style constraint programming
> for free:
>
> subset Crosshair of Point where { $_.inside_of($target_zone) };
>
> Is that valid syntax?
Yes. See http://perlcabal.org/syn/S02.html#Polymorphic_types for similar
examples.
Cheers,
Moritz
--
Moritz Lenz
http://moritz.faui2k3.org/ | http://perl-6.de/
t *g* (not serious)
I haven't thought a lot about the third option, and what it would mean
to the language as a whole, so I have no idea if it's a viable alternative.
Any thoughts on the topic are welcome. I hope I didn't confuse too much
here ;-)
Cheers,
Moritz
--
Moritz Lenz
http://moritz.faui2k3.org/ | http://perl-6.de/
-') ?
Probably the same as (~[1,3,5], 20).join('-')
> Thanks!
>
> Pm
--
Moritz Lenz
http://moritz.faui2k3.org/ | http://perl-6.de/
should now that
sqrt() is ambigous, because there are two possible results, and will
revert to roots() for that.
Any thoughts?
Moritz
--
Moritz Lenz
http://moritz.faui2k3.org/ | http://perl-6.de/
nt.
What's our policy on that? Will a 1.WHAT always return Int? do we
guarantee (1..4).WHAT always to be 'Range'?
Cheers,
Moritz
--
Moritz Lenz
http://moritz.faui2k3.org/ | http://perl-6.de/
(cross-posting to p6l)
Ryan Richter wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 11:36:05AM +0200, Moritz Lenz wrote:
>> 2) How do we know which numeric type is a class and which is a role? Is
>> there an explicit spec about the types of number literals? That could
>> have some impac
Mark J. Reed wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 10:23 AM, Moritz Lenz
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Thanks for the effort, but it also raises new questions. For example:
>>> Int is Num
>> Rakudo doesn't do it that way, because the 'A is B' relatio
Trey Harris wrote:
> In a message dated Thu, 26 Jun 2008, Moritz Lenz writes:
>> I assume that 'Num' is meant to be a non-complex.
>> Then it seems to make sense to assume:
>> Int is Rat
>> Rat is Num
>> Num is Complex
>> or am I off again?
>
&g
Larry Wall wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 04:50:21PM +0200, Moritz Lenz wrote:
> : I assume that 'Num' is meant to be a non-complex.
> : Then it seems to make sense to assume:
> : Int is Rat
> : Rat is Num
> : Num is Complex
> : or am I off again?
>
> W
if it should work for non-List $x. $Larry said yes, it
should work, and the way to achieve that is to use Any.join.
Now Patrick wants to know which of the various list methods need to be
in Any.
BTW Junctions aren't a subtype of Any, but of Object.
> If I've misunderstood, feel free to
Conrad Schneiker wrote:
>> Moritz Lenz wrote (on perl6-compiler)
>> Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
>> >> +S02-builtin_data_types/num.t
>> >> S02-builtin_data_types/type.t
>> >> S02-literals/autoref.t
>> >> S02-literals/hex_chars.t
i like Complex.angle does)? Or simply fix the test to be agnostic to
complex planes?
Cheers,
Moritz
--
Moritz Lenz
http://moritz.faui2k3.org/ | http://perl-6.de/
Jon Lang wrote:
> Larry Wall wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 03:30:24PM +0200, Moritz Lenz wrote:
>> : Today bacek++ implement complex logarithms in rakudo, and one of the
>> : tests failed because it assumed the result to be on a different complex
>> : plane. (l
Jon Lang wrote:
> Moritz Lenz wrote:
>> Jon Lang wrote:
>>> By the principle of least surprise, I'd recommend against this. Most
>>> programmers, when they see 'sqrt(1)', will expect a return value of 1,
>>
>> And that's what they get un
...)
All comments are welcome.
Cheers,
Moritz
--
Moritz Lenz
http://moritz.faui2k3.org/ | http://perl-6.de/
John M. Dlugosz wrote:
> Does that mean there is a tool I can use to apply STD.pm to syntax-check
> my examples or ask questions of it? Can you point to that?
in the pugs repository:
$ cd src/perl6
$ make
$ ./tryfile $filename
That assumes a perl 5.10 in /usr/local/bin/perl
HTH,
new wording, for Larry (the document owner)
> to have.
>
> --John
--
Moritz Lenz
http://moritz.faui2k3.org/ | http://perl-6.de/
hat C doesn't interpolate.)
--
Moritz Lenz
http://moritz.faui2k3.org/ | http://perl-6.de/
ssignment? If
you do a
@a = @b
you get cloning behaviour because the @ sigil implies a container type,
whereas a with a $ sigil you just hand references to objects.
> I would somewhat expect
> a reference to be instead handled using a statement like
>
> $foo[1] := $bar;
>
> Comments and clarifications appreciated.
>
> Pm
--
Moritz Lenz
http://moritz.faui2k3.org/ | http://perl-6.de/
; So, how set array attribute of a class by new method?
I'd expect this to work:
class Dog {
has @.names;
method bark() {
say @.names.join(', ');
}
}
my $x = Dog.new(:names);
# or: Dog.new(name => ('foo', 'bar'))
$x.bark;
but currently it doesn't in rakudo (in does in pugs though)
--
Moritz Lenz
http://moritz.faui2k3.org/ | http://perl-6.de/
CTED]
The recommended way to write such a sub is
sub xsum([EMAIL PROTECTED]) { ... }
xsum(1, 2, 3);
With the * before the @list it is "slurpy", which means that it doesn't
expect one list as the argument, but rather an arbitrary number of items.
If you happen to have an Array already, you can interpolate it:
my @x = 1, 2, 3;
xsum(|@x);
HTH,
Moritz
--
Moritz Lenz
http://moritz.faui2k3.org/ | http://perl-6.de/
Scalar Array,
> and thus the for loop sees only one element.
>
> This probably deserves a tracking ticket at <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
Already wrote one:
[perl #58276] AutoReply: [BUG] Can't iterate over list that was passed
as a subroutine argument
Cheers,
Moritz
--
Moritz Lenz
http://moritz.faui2k3.org/ | http://perl-6.de/
:Match'current instr.: '_block11' pc 60 (EVAL_14:24)]
>
> S05:2377:
>
> The currently defined methods are
>
> $/.from # the initial match position
> $/.to # the final match position
> $/.chars # $/.to - $/.from
> $/.orig # the origi
Moritz Lenz wrote:
> Tests 34 to 36 were a bit overcritical:
>
> (0|undef && say "not ok 34") || say "not ok 34";
> (0&undef && say "not ok 35") || say "not ok 35";
> (0^undef && say "not ok 36") || say
Larry Wall wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 09:22:25PM +0200, Moritz Lenz wrote:
> : Moritz Lenz wrote:
> : > Tests 34 to 36 were a bit overcritical:
> : >
> : > (0|undef && say "not ok 34") || say "not ok 34";
> : > (0&undef &&a
Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 12:15:05AM +0200, Moritz Lenz wrote:
>> Larry Wall wrote:
>> > I think it would be best if all boolean contexts collapse consistently,
>> > and I would consider all of those to be boolean contexts. More
>> >
:
>
> perl6regex parse error: Error in closure quantifier at offset 28, found '''
>
> Is this feature unsupported at the moment or am I misunderstanding it?
It seems to be not yet supported, yes.
Moritz
--
Moritz Lenz
http://moritz.faui2k3.org/ | http://perl-6.de/
"Code" mean? A code object? or the name of a sub?
Since it says that the first dispatch is based on the form, I could
imagine that ~~ has some kind of macro semantics, actually.
CC'ing p6l in the hope of some clarification.
Cheers,
Moritz
--
Moritz Lenz
http://moritz.faui2k3.org/ | http://perl-6.de/
st.pm that are not used (for example unlike(), which is only used in
t/02-test-pm/1-basic.t to test unlike()).
So how should we proceed? Should I assemble a list of commonly used test
functions and remove all others both in the Test.pm's and the test files?
And then? Spec it? Or ship a proto
p a
symbol table yet while parsing, so it uses the case of the first letter
to distinguish type names from sub names. This is an evil hack that will
at some point be cleaned up.
Cheers,
Moritz
--
Moritz Lenz
http://moritz.faui2k3.org/ | http://perl-6.de/
The subject says it all: should !~~ with a regex on the RHS set $/?
Cheers,
Moritz
--
Moritz Lenz
http://moritz.faui2k3.org/ | http://perl-6.de/
_ok('(1, 2).uniq', 'List.uniq not specced');
Moritz
--
Moritz Lenz
http://moritz.faui2k3.org/ | http://perl-6.de/
nternally iterators that generate elements as needed or
> perhaps in the background. But how do you create such a thing? Something
> like:
>
> @lazy_list := parallel-map { get_info($_) } @filenames;
@lazy_list = @filenames.map: { get_info($_) };
I suppose ;-)
--
Moritz Lenz
http://
Damian Conway wrote:
> Moritz Lenz wrote:
>
>> There are some tests for List.uniq in the test suite, and pugs
>> implements it, but it's not in S29.
>> Damian seems to have though we should have it.
>> So should we have it?
>
> I still think we sho
e how it's done, I just want it to be
specced ;-)
Moritz
--
Moritz Lenz
http://moritz.faui2k3.org/ | http://perl-6.de/
--- Rule.pod.old 2008-09-08 17:27:42.0 +0200
+++ Rule.pod 2008-09-08 17:32:15.0 +0200
@@ -3586,8 +3586,6 @@
$parsetree = m:keepall//;
of the synopsis that's correct, but rather
unintuitive.
So, what should $x be after these two statements?
--
Moritz Lenz
http://moritz.faui2k3.org/ | http://perl-6.de/
exceptions like Str.substr, which explicitly 'is rw',
and which implies that the object somehow has to gain access to its
container).
Moritz
--
Moritz Lenz
http://moritz.faui2k3.org/ | http://perl-6.de/
!foo'?
> Finally, some useless statistics: I count 12 attributes in different
> classes in November right now. Out of those, 12 (100%) have the "is
> rw" attribute.
This is mostly probably due to non-working constructors. Simple cases
seem to work, though:
12:29 < mori
wback that calling with a string literal is precluded.
Makes sense to me. (The Int should really be StrLen, but that's only a
minor glitch).
That said, much of S29 needs some loving care...
Moritz
--
Moritz Lenz
http://moritz.faui2k3.org/ | http://perl-6.de/
Hi,
what should ''.split('') return? The empty list, or a list with one null
string?
Moritz
--
Moritz Lenz
http://moritz.faui2k3.org/ | http://perl-6.de/
Larry Wall wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 05:58:59PM +0200, Moritz Lenz wrote:
> : Hi,
> :
> : what should ''.split('') return? The empty list, or a list with one null
> : string?
>
> Empty list would make more sense as a degenerate case. In
>
>
olution I could think of
1) A limit of 0 returns the empty list (you want zero items, you get them)
2) A limit of 0 fail()s
3) non-positive $limit arguments are rejected by the signature (Int
where { $_ > 0 })
Any thoughts?
Moritz
--
Moritz Lenz
http://moritz.faui2k3.org/ | http://perl-6.de/
$regex.has_capture (which might return either True
(unconditional captures) or False (no captures at all) or True|False
(for my example above) ;-)
Cheers,
Moritz
--
Moritz Lenz
http://moritz.faui2k3.org/ | http://perl-6.de/
gt; is $f2(:a), "Bool", "in '\$f2(:a)', ':a' is a named";
>
> However, S02 says that C<:a> corresponds to C<< a => 1 >> in
> fatarrow notation, which seems to argue that C<:a> should in
> fact have an Int value.
>
> Are the tests correct here, or am I reading too much into
> the synopsis description?
Most likely the tests are wrong.
Moritz
--
Moritz Lenz
http://moritz.faui2k3.org/ | http://perl-6.de/
where the
context decides.
Perl 5:
say reverse "abc";# abc\n
say scalar reverse "abc"; # cba\n
Maybe the solution is to avoid name conflicts in this case, maybe name
the methods like this:
Str.mirror
List.reverse
Hash.inverse (or Hash.flip)
(I've never been good wit
out a copy of the svn repo, and grep/ack in them
* ask in #perl6 where some particular item is documented
Sadly we have next to no user-level documentation at them moment. The
closest might be the open sourced version of "Perl 6 and Parrot
Essentials", but it's rather incomplete and some parts are quite out of
date.
[1] some operators like ~~ actually have more macroish semantics
--
Moritz Lenz
http://perlgeek.de/ | http://perl-6.de/ | http://sudokugarden.de/
ble
List = immutable, lazy
Seq = immutable, eager
Moritz
--
Moritz Lenz
http://perlgeek.de/ | http://perl-6.de/ | http://sudokugarden.de/
act, the [...] and {...} forms are really just extra documentation
> +about what you expect.
I guess it's not intentional to use the same example twice?
Moritz
--
Moritz Lenz
http://perlgeek.de/ | http://perl-6.de/ | http://sudokugarden.de/
;,
' ',
'456'
I don't know if the syntax and exact semantics are very good, but IMHO
we should have some way of reconstructing a match that is closer to the
original string than to the structure of the matching regex.
(I also don't know if that's feasible in terms of efficiency)
Any ideas?
Moritz
--
Moritz Lenz
http://perlgeek.de/ | http://perl-6.de/ | http://sudokugarden.de/
Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 11:44:05AM +0200, Moritz Lenz wrote:
>> When we write regexes, we generally capture stuff in a way that makes
>> the following semantic analysis easier. For example we could have a
>> regex m/ + ? */ if we're only intere
while testing
> core features?
The 01-sanity/ tests predate module loading.
The "real" testing is to run 'make spectest', which loads a bunch of
tests from the pugs repository, prepares and run them.
If you want to run those individually, you can simply say
$ make t/spec/S02-literals/radix.t
Cheers,
Moritz
--
Moritz Lenz
http://perlgeek.de/ | http://perl-6.de/ | http://sudokugarden.de/
Ovid wrote:
> --- On Mon, 20/10/08, Moritz Lenz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>> > Also, the way that t/00-parrot/06-op-inplace.t is
>> written forces the test numbers to be out of sequence. This
>> causes "make test" to fail, even though
ssible as a function (or a macro) already, for
example the operator in 2 + 3 is known as &infix:<+>.
The ternary is a rather ugly case, I guess it's called &infix:($condition, $true, $false), and it's short-circuiting, so it must be
a macro rather than normal function.
Cheers,
Moritz
--
Moritz Lenz
http://perlgeek.de/ | http://perl-6.de/ | http://sudokugarden.de/
y models (think of SeLinux for example).
If 'use fatal' is in effect, that dies, if not, you can check the return
value.
For chmod() I could imagine an interface like this:
$file.chmod(:8<540>);
$file.chmod( :set, :user => :r & :x, :group => :r)
# both same as
Larry Wall wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 07:30:08PM +0100, Moritz Lenz wrote:
> : For chmod() I could imagine an interface like this:
> :
> : $file.chmod(:8<540>);
> : $file.chmod( :set, :user => :r & :x, :group => :r)
> :# both same as 'chmod 54
o use arrays instead.
(The thing that's still wrong with your code is that you need a
whitespace after the 'my', otherwise my(...) should be parsed as a
function call).
Cheers,
Moritz
--
Moritz Lenz
http://perlgeek.de/ | http://perl-6.de/ | http://sudokugarden.de/
Andy Colson wrote:
> Moritz Lenz wrote:
>> Andy Colson wrote:
>>> (Sorry if this dbl-posts, sent it from the wrong account the first time)
>>>
>>> Hi all, what's wrong with this code:
>>>
>>> use v6;
>>>
>>>
jerry gay wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 10:43, via RT Moritz Lenz
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> # New Ticket Created by Moritz Lenz
>> # Please include the string: [perl #60732]
>> # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
>
1 - 100 of 352 matches
Mail list logo
