Author: pmichaud
Date: 2009-06-12 18:29:50 +0200 (Fri, 12 Jun 2009)
New Revision: 27060
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S04-control.pod
Log:
[spec]: Correct buglet in example --
squaring elements of array is @a ?\194?\187**?\194?\187 2, not @a [**] 2.
Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S04-control.pod
===
Author: pmichaud
Date: 2009-06-12 18:30:25 +0200 (Fri, 12 Jun 2009)
New Revision: 27061
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S03-operators.pod
Log:
[spec]: Correct typo: "fullwith" --> "fullwidth"
Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S03-operators.pod
=
Author: lwall
Date: 2009-06-12 18:33:26 +0200 (Fri, 12 Jun 2009)
New Revision: 27062
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S32-setting-library/Containers.pod
Log:
[Containers] add @array.rotate, define push and unshift to return array
Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S32-setting-library/Containers.pod
=
Author: lwall
Date: 2009-06-12 18:34:34 +0200 (Fri, 12 Jun 2009)
New Revision: 27063
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S32-setting-library/Containers.pod
Log:
[Containers] default rotation is 1
Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S32-setting-library/Containers.pod
==
Author: lwall
Date: 2009-06-12 18:47:24 +0200 (Fri, 12 Jun 2009)
New Revision: 27064
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S32-setting-library/Containers.pod
Log:
[Containers] more clarifications
Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S32-setting-library/Containers.pod
I am tickled pink to see an Array "rotate" method in the settings spec
S032, as I was thinking of writing up a little discussion on the very
topic.
Has there been discussion on using array rotate on multi-dimensional
arrays? Being able to pass in a vector as the amount to rotate would
be useful. e
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 10:02 AM, yary wrote:
> I am tickled pink to see an Array "rotate" method in the settings spec
> S032, as I was thinking of writing up a little discussion on the very
> topic.
>
> Has there been discussion on using array rotate on multi-dimensional
> arrays? Being able to pa
Author: lwall
Date: 2009-06-12 19:18:58 +0200 (Fri, 12 Jun 2009)
New Revision: 27066
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S03-operators.pod
Log:
[S03] tweak rangechars not to be limited to \w
Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S03-operators.pod
===
Putting this in a new thread, as I'd like to discuss it separately
from refinements to Array.rotate
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 10:11 AM, Jon Lang wrote:
> With a multi-dimensional array, a number of transforms can be considered:
>
> * you can rearrange the elements along a given dimension (e.g., rota
I think any 1D op could be transformed to "do the right thing" on a
multidimensional array, with some sort or hyperop or reduction
transform. Rotate, reverse, even add/subtract can be told "do your
thing along this vector" and return a usefully dimensioned result.
Need to work on other things at t
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 10:58 AM, yary wrote:
>> * you can rearrange the dimensions themselves (e.g., transpose).
>
> Reflecting on 2 or more axes creates a transposition.
No, it doesn't:
@a = (1, 2, 3; 4, 5, 6; 7, 8, 9);
Reflecting on two axes would result in:
@a = (9, 8, 7; 6, 5, 4; 3
Ok, There's one thing that is not clear in the thread, which is when an
array is multidimensional or not...
For instance:
@a = (1, 2, 3; 4, 5, 6; 7, 8, 9);
Will produce a flatten array, because list assignment causes flattening,
so the dimensionality was lost.
It is important to remember that
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 11:51 AM, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
> Ok, There's one thing that is not clear in the thread, which is when an
> array is multidimensional or not...
>
> For instance:
>
> �...@a = (1, 2, 3; 4, 5, 6; 7, 8, 9);
>
> Will produce a flatten array, because list assignment causes flatteni
Em Sex, 2009-06-12 às 11:52 -0700, Jon Lang escreveu:
> On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 11:51 AM, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
> > Ok, There's one thing that is not clear in the thread, which is when an
> > array is multidimensional or not...
> > For instance:
> > @a = (1, 2, 3; 4, 5, 6; 7, 8, 9);
> > Will produce
We also need to consider the "dimension" of referentiality. I can see
three levels here. Given
@a.mung
the .mung could return
A) a modified @a (treat @a as mutable)
B) a new array (treat @a as immutable)
C) a remapped array whose elements refer back to @a's elements
Currently
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 04:00:10PM -0300, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
: Em Sex, 2009-06-12 às 11:52 -0700, Jon Lang escreveu:
: > On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 11:51 AM, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
: > > Ok, There's one thing that is not clear in the thread, which is when an
: > > array is multidimensional or not...
: >
Larry mused:
> �...@a.mung
>
> the .mung could return
>
> A) a modified @a (treat @a as mutable)
> B) a new array (treat @a as immutable)
> C) a remapped array whose elements refer back to @a's elements
>
> Currently .rotate is defined as A, but I could easily switch it to B,
I, for on
Damian Conway wrote:
In fact, I would even be happy with requiring @a.=push and @a.=shift, if
it meant that there were *no* special cases. One extra character is a
small price to pay for perfect SWIM (and not just "Say What I Mean",
the real benefit is the other SWIM: "See What I Meant").
I don
Author: lwall
Date: 2009-06-13 01:47:29 +0200 (Sat, 13 Jun 2009)
New Revision: 27073
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S32-setting-library/Containers.pod
Log:
[Containers] define .rotate more like a PDL slice, rely on other ops for exact
semantics
Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S32-setting-library/Contai
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 01:25:23AM +0200, Daniel Carrera wrote:
> Damian Conway wrote:
>> In fact, I would even be happy with requiring @a.=push and @a.=shift, if
>> it meant that there were *no* special cases. One extra character is a
>> small price to pay for perfect SWIM (and not just "Say What
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 1:08 AM, Larry Wall wrote:
> Nevertheless, for any major methods borrowed from Perl 6, I'm not
> inclined to change them that drastically. Much more likely to
> define them as sugar for the more general list operators:
>
> .push means .=append
> .unshift me
21 matches
Mail list logo
