Em Sex, 2009-06-12 às 11:52 -0700, Jon Lang escreveu: > On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 11:51 AM, Daniel Ruoso<dan...@ruoso.com> wrote: > > Ok, There's one thing that is not clear in the thread, which is when an > > array is multidimensional or not... > > For instance: > > @a = (1, 2, 3; 4, 5, 6; 7, 8, 9); > > Will produce a flatten array, because list assignment causes flattening, > > so the dimensionality was lost. > Right. I should have said: > @@a = (1, 2, 3; 4, 5, 6; 7, 8, 9);
The important point here is that it means we're dealing with a different type, so it can actually behave differently, so "@@a.rotate" would rotate the first dimension only.. maybe @@a.rotate(1;1) would mean to rotate by 1 in the first dimension and by 1 in the second, producing (5, 6, 4; 8, 9, 7; 2, 3, 1) daniel
