Damian Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > It was Damian's, no?
>>
>> I bet he has a paper on it.
>
> http://www.csse.monash.edu.au/~damian/Perl/want.proposal
Ooh, I like that. I'm already frustrated with the current lvalue
setup, this would be a big improvement. Actually, I'd
> > It was Damian's, no?
>
> I bet he has a paper on it.
http://www.csse.monash.edu.au/~damian/Perl/want.proposal
:-)
Damian
> >This reminds me -- once there was a proposal to extend the wantarray
> >functionality on p5p. Anyone remember? Anyone want to turn it into an
> >RFC?
>
> It was Damian's, no?
I certainly claim it and intend to RFC it.
I already have improvements to the previous proposal in min
On Thu, Aug 03, 2000 at 09:41:07AM -0700, Peter Scott wrote:
> The last iteration of the Conway (nee Phoenix) proposal is at
> http://www.csse.monash.edu.au/~damian/Perl/want.proposal unless he's taken
> it elsewhere. It is (predictably) far more comprehensive than anything
> anyone else has c
At 11:00 AM 8/3/00 -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
>At 03:03 PM 8/3/00 +0200, Johan Vromans wrote:
>>On Thu, Aug 03, 2000 at 10:53:02AM +0100, Hildo Biersma wrote:
>> > If functions could distinguish between
>> > 'wantarray' and 'wanthash' this would be easy to do.
>>
>>This reminds me -- once there wa
At 03:03 PM 8/3/00 +0200, Johan Vromans wrote:
>On Thu, Aug 03, 2000 at 10:53:02AM +0100, Hildo Biersma wrote:
> > If functions could distinguish between
> > 'wantarray' and 'wanthash' this would be easy to do.
>
>This reminds me -- once there was a proposal to extend the wantarray
>functionality
On Thu, Aug 03, 2000 at 07:04:05AM -0600, Tom Christiansen wrote:
> >This reminds me -- once there was a proposal to extend the wantarray
> >functionality on p5p. Anyone remember? Anyone want to turn it into an
> >RFC?
>
> It was Damian's, no?
I bet he has a paper on it.
-- Johan
>This reminds me -- once there was a proposal to extend the wantarray
>functionality on p5p. Anyone remember? Anyone want to turn it into an
>RFC?
It was Damian's, no?
--tom
