Damian Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > It was Damian's, no? > > > > I bet he has a paper on it. > > http://www.csse.monash.edu.au/~damian/Perl/want.proposal Ooh, I like that. I'm already frustrated with the current lvalue setup, this would be a big improvement. Actually, I'd like to see some way of getting at the values that are going to be assigned to an lvalue function so my function could do some pre/post assignment checks. Though I suppose you could get that functionality now by doing some tie magic. But that would be scary. -- Piers
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl6 req... Dan Sugalski
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl6 requirement... Damian Conway
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl6 requirements, on boo... Matt Sergeant
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl6 requirements, o... Hildo Biersma
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl6 requirement... Matt Sergeant
- wanthash (Was: Re: date interface (was Re: pe... Johan Vromans
- Re: wanthash (Was: Re: date interface (wa... Tom Christiansen
- Re: wanthash (Was: Re: date interface... Johan Vromans
- Re: wanthash (Was: Re: date interface... Damian Conway
- Re: wanthash Piers Cawley
- Re: wanthash Dan Sugalski
- Re: wanthash Peter Scott
- Re: wanthash Graham Barr
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl6 requirement... Simon Cozens
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl6 require... Tom Christiansen
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl6 req... Simon Cozens
- wantarray() should be named wantlist() (was R... Tad McClellan
- Re: wantarray() should be named wantlist(... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: wantarray() should be named wantl... Clayton Scott
- Re: wantarray() should be named ... Jonathan Scott Duff