Juerd wrote:
I personally would not mind requiring whitespace around & in those
cases.
Same here. Actually the whitespace after & makes the destinction, or not?
If parens are used for the grouping, then why is the colon required?
Because it escapes into type-space like ::() escapes into name-space
Larry Wall skribis 2005-05-03 6:22 (-0700):
> sub foo (Int&Str &block) {...}
> sub foo (:(Int&Str) &block) {...}
> Alternately, we install a small heuristic and document it in the fine print.
I personally would not mind requiring whitespace around & in those
cases.
If parens are used for
On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 08:33:06PM +0200, Juerd wrote:
: I think it would be great to be able to use a junction with use:
:
: use strict & warnings;
:
: A disjunction could mean any of the listed modules suffices. This comes
: in handy when you code something that will work with any of three
