Larry Wall skribis 2005-05-03 6:22 (-0700):
> sub foo (Int&Str &block) {...}
> sub foo (:(Int&Str) &block) {...}
> Alternately, we install a small heuristic and document it in the fine print.
I personally would not mind requiring whitespace around & in those
cases.
If parens are used for the grouping, then why is the colon required?
> The "use" ambiguity might easily be resolved by saying that "use"
> always parses using indirect object syntax, which would distinguish
> use strict & warnings;
> from
> use strict: &warnings;
I thought whitespace after the sigil was no longer allowed? That
certainly fits in the sigil-is-part-of-the-name-thing.
Juerd
--
http://convolution.nl/maak_juerd_blij.html
http://convolution.nl/make_juerd_happy.html
http://convolution.nl/gajigu_juerd_n.html
