James Ryley wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I was wondering if anything ever became of the comments at
> http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg00318.html?
>
> I have an application that would benefit from double interpolation. Of
> course I can work around it, but double interpolation would be so much
> cleaner. Was
> By ultimate control, I meant that if you have an interpolate command,
> you can then do whatever you want at each stage. You could do:
>
> $z = interpolate interpolate $y;
Good point. Well, we were brainstorming macros for a reason ;). But an
efficient version would be nice, I suppose.
On 4 Apr 2002, Aaron Sherman wrote:
> On Thu, 2002-04-04 at 11:09, Luke Palmer wrote:
> > On Thu, 4 Apr 2002, James Ryley wrote:
>
> > How 'bout:
> >
> > $foo = 'def';
> > $bar = 'ghi';
> > $y = 'abc$foo$bar';
> > $z = eval qq{"$y"};
> >
> > Of course, for security and correctness reasons, you
> > How 'bout:
> >
> > $foo = 'def';
> > $bar = 'ghi';
> > $y = 'abc$foo$bar';
> > $z = eval qq{"$y"};
> >
> > Of course, for security and correctness reasons, you'd probably want
to:
> >
> > $y =~ s/\\//g;
> > $y =~ s/"!/\\"/g;
>
> Why would "\\t" not double-interpolate to a tab? Also, why w
On Thu, 4 Apr 2002, James Ryley wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was wondering if anything ever became of the comments at
> http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg00318.html?
>
> I have an application that would benefit from double interpolation. Of
> course I can work around it, but double interpolation would be so muc
