James Ryley wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I was wondering if anything ever became of the comments at
> http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg00318.html?
>
> I have an application that would benefit from double interpolation. Of
> course I can work around it, but double interpolation would be so much
> cleaner. Was it ever implemented, or will it be?
>
> Sincerely,
> James
I remember briefly being in favor of a scheme-like qqq() quoting
operator but realized that the security implications are really
insane -- you have so much more control with stuff like
$string =~ s/\[(\w+)\]/$stash{$1}/ge;
that there isn't even a whole lot of space to improve that
except of course for designing some way to express it more
compactly via a macro definition method (keeping us on topic
in a perl6 list -- although I might be unwittingly violating
some kind of thread staleness standard which has appeared in
the ensuing years)
david nicol
