Jeremy Howard wrote:
>
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > >
> > > Could we please take discussion of 179 to -data? I think that's where
> > > it should be.
> > >
> > > K.
> >
> > Personnally, I don't see any objection to this.
> > If everybody is ok, why not ?
> >
> > How should I process ? Submit
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > Could we please take discussion of 179 to -data? I think that's where
> > it should be.
> >
> > K.
>
> Personnally, I don't see any objection to this.
> If everybody is ok, why not ?
>
> How should I process ? Submit again the proposal with a modified
> mailing-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Could we please take discussion of 179 to -data? I think that's where
> it should be.
>
> K.
Personnally, I don't see any objection to this.
If everybody is ok, why not ?
How should I process ? Submit again the proposal with a modified
mailing-list email ?
Gael,
Could we please take discussion of 179 to -data? I think that's where
it should be.
K.
--
Kirrily Robert -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- http://netizen.com.au/
Open Source development, consulting and solutions
Level 10, 500 Collins St, Melbourne VIC 3000
Phone: +61 3 9614 0949 Fax: +61 3 9614 0948
