Re: Please take RFC 179 discussion to -data

[Gael Pegliasco]

Jeremy Howard wrote:
> 
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > >
> > > Could we please take discussion of 179 to -data?  I think that's where
> > > it should be.
> > >
> > > K.
> >
> > Personnally, I don't see any objection to this.
> > If everybody is ok, why not ?
> >
> > How should I process ? Submit again the proposal with a modified
> > mailing-list email ?
> >
> > Gael,
> 
> Yes.
> 
> If you do this, I suggest you take the opportunity to fill out RFC 179 with
> more detail. In particular:
> 
>  - Why you think set operations should work on arrays rather than hashes
>  - In what way the current Set:: modules are insufficient
>  - Why set operations should be added to the core rather than a module
> 
> That way the list will be able to understand the reasoning behind the RFC
> better.


Ok, I'm going to do this.
But I'm quite busy at this time, so I'm going to try to do this on next
friday (15th sept.)

Gael,