Re: FP6: Types

2005-02-03 Thread Juerd
Stéphane Payrard skribis 2005-02-03 18:18 (+0100): > perl6-compiler@perl.org seems a good forum to me for your endeavor > because you write a compiler for a subset of Perl6. What someone *does* is irrelevant. The topic of the mail message matters, and if that is the language, this is the right lis

Re: FP6: Types

2005-02-03 Thread Matt Fowles
Autrijus~ Actually, I think that p6l is the correct place for this discussion. My logic is that you are asking about specific facets of the language, not helping the perl 6 compiler or parrot. Matt On Fri, 4 Feb 2005 01:28:42 +0800, Autrijus Tang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 03, 20

Re: FP6: Types

2005-02-03 Thread Autrijus Tang
On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 06:18:33PM +0100, St廧hane Payrard wrote: > perl6-compiler@perl.org seems a good forum to me for your endeavor > because you write a compiler for a subset of Perl6. Okay. If that is the desired forum, tomorrow I'll switch my questions to p6c and unsubscribe from p6l. Sorry

Re: FP6: Types

2005-02-03 Thread =?iso-8859-1?Q?St=E9phane?= Payrard
On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 11:17:50AM -0500, Mark J. Reed wrote: > > On 2005-02-03 at 11:13:30, Autrijus Tang wrote: > >Today I've started implementing typing relations for value types in > >FP6. ... > > Shouldn't this have gone to perl6-internals, not perl6-language? > perl6-compiler@per

Re: FP6: Types

2005-02-03 Thread Mark J. Reed
On 2005-02-03 at 11:13:30, Autrijus Tang wrote: >Today I've started implementing typing relations for value types in >FP6. ... Shouldn't this have gone to perl6-internals, not perl6-language?

Re: FP6: Types

2005-02-03 Thread Autrijus Tang
On Fri, Feb 04, 2005 at 12:19:36AM +0800, Autrijus Tang wrote: > Uh, as this is an ask-for-clarification for a Synopsis, I think p6l > is the correct forum. Of course, as I'm new to this list, I may be > totally wrong, in which case please tell me so. :-) To be more precise, according to S06:

Re: FP6: Types

2005-02-03 Thread Autrijus Tang
On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 11:17:50AM -0500, Mark J. Reed wrote: > > On 2005-02-03 at 11:13:30, Autrijus Tang wrote: > >Today I've started implementing typing relations for value types in > >FP6. ... > > Shouldn't this have gone to perl6-internals, not perl6-language? Uh, as this is an ask

FP6: Types

2005-02-03 Thread Autrijus Tang
Today I've started implementing typing relations for value types in FP6. I intend to hold off subtyping until the simple types can be checked and matched against smoothly. The types are currently: VBool Boolean VIntInteger VNumNumber VStrString V