Autrijus~ Actually, I think that p6l is the correct place for this discussion. My logic is that you are asking about specific facets of the language, not helping the perl 6 compiler or parrot.
Matt On Fri, 4 Feb 2005 01:28:42 +0800, Autrijus Tang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 06:18:33PM +0100, Ståhane Payrard wrote: > > perl6-compiler@perl.org seems a good forum to me for your endeavor > > because you write a compiler for a subset of Perl6. > > Okay. If that is the desired forum, tomorrow I'll switch my questions > to p6c and unsubscribe from p6l. Sorry for bothering the people > involved. :-) > > > You are speaking of types, do you intend to explore type inference? > > Yes, eventually. > > > The problem is more complex than with statically typed language, but > > somewhat simplified by the choice of a purely functional subset of Perl6. > > Which is why I started with such a subset... > > Thanks, > /Autrijus/ > > > -- "Computer Science is merely the post-Turing Decline of Formal Systems Theory." -???
