Re: RFC 143 (v1) Case ignoring eq and cmp operators

2000-08-24 Thread Mark Cogan
) Nope. Read the manual. --- Mark Cogan[EMAIL PROTECTED] +1-520-881-8101 ArtToday www.arttoday.com

Re: RFC 104 (v1) Backtracking

2000-08-15 Thread Mark Cogan
At 11:05 PM 8/15/00 -0500, Jonathan Scott Duff wrote: >On Tue, Aug 15, 2000 at 08:59:25PM -0700, Mark Cogan wrote: > > At 11:43 PM 8/15/00 -0400, Chaim Frenkel wrote: > > >Counter example:@a = \($a, $b, $c); > > > > I guess I'm missing the point; ho

Re: RFC 104 (v1) Backtracking

2000-08-15 Thread Mark Cogan
At 11:43 PM 8/15/00 -0400, Chaim Frenkel wrote: > >>>>> "MC" == Mark Cogan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >MC> What should: >MC> @a = defined @a; >MC> return? > >Counter example:@a = \($a, $b, $c); I guess I'm missing the p

Re: RFC 104 (v1) Backtracking

2000-08-15 Thread Mark Cogan
; >or perhaps a modifier? > > @result = @a || @b forall; > >(Blech, that just doesn read right.) Perhaps we just need a two-list map, which aliases $a and $b like sort(): @result = map {$a || $b} @a,@b; ------- Ma

Re: RFC 104 (v1) Backtracking

2000-08-15 Thread Mark Cogan
At 12:39 PM 8/16/00 +1000, Jeremy Howard wrote: >Mark Cogan wrote: > > At 05:47 PM 8/15/00 -0600, Nathan Torkington wrote: > > >Jeremy Howard writes: > > > > @result = @a || @b; > > > > > > > > Which applies '||' component-wise

Re: RFC 104 (v1) Backtracking

2000-08-15 Thread Mark Cogan
I want to iterate over @a, I should have to do so explicitly, with a for() or map(). --- Mark Cogan[EMAIL PROTECTED] +1-520-881-8101 ArtToday www.arttoday.com

Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (stringifying comma) with =>

2000-08-11 Thread Mark Cogan
>whether it is >relevant to this RFC. Camel, 2e, page 50 : "The => operator is just a synonym for a comma, but it's more visually distinctive, and it also quotes any bare identifiers to the left of it..." --- Mark Cogan[EMAIL PROTECTED] +1-520-881-8101 ArtToday www.arttoday.com