Autrijus Tang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> However, I'd still like to know whether my understanding on punning
> (same class 'Array' used as both Implementation Type and Value Type)
> and the validity of matching on "$var is TraitName" in subroutine
> signatures is correct. That, and types of hash
My apologies if this has been asked and answered. I seem to recall it
being discussed, but for the life of me I can't find a clear reference
to it.
What is logic programming in Perl 6 expected to look like? Larry
writes that he wants "logic programming to be one of the paradigms that
Perl suppor
On Fri, Feb 04, 2005 at 04:09:03AM +0800, Autrijus Tang wrote:
> Okay. So "Egg" is the value type for elements in @carton. But what
> is the implementation type of @carton?
>
> my @carton of Egg is Scalar;# is @carton Scalar?
> my @carton of Egg is Array; # is @carton Arr
Sorry for the last thread. Please let it die off. Let me restart the
thread, asking the same question, hopefully making more sense this time.
I promise to write in concrete Perl6, instead of Compiler Speak. Really.
In Synopsis 6 version 6, "Value types" section:
my Dog $spot;
my $spo
Stéphane Payrard skribis 2005-02-03 18:18 (+0100):
> perl6-compiler@perl.org seems a good forum to me for your endeavor
> because you write a compiler for a subset of Perl6.
What someone *does* is irrelevant. The topic of the mail message
matters, and if that is the language, this is the right lis
Autrijus~
Actually, I think that p6l is the correct place for this discussion.
My logic is that you are asking about specific facets of the language,
not helping the perl 6 compiler or parrot.
Matt
On Fri, 4 Feb 2005 01:28:42 +0800, Autrijus Tang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 03, 20
On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 06:18:33PM +0100, St廧hane Payrard wrote:
> perl6-compiler@perl.org seems a good forum to me for your endeavor
> because you write a compiler for a subset of Perl6.
Okay. If that is the desired forum, tomorrow I'll switch my questions
to p6c and unsubscribe from p6l. Sorry
On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 11:17:50AM -0500, Mark J. Reed wrote:
>
> On 2005-02-03 at 11:13:30, Autrijus Tang wrote:
> >Today I've started implementing typing relations for value types in
> >FP6. ...
>
> Shouldn't this have gone to perl6-internals, not perl6-language?
>
perl6-compiler@per
On 2005-02-03 at 11:13:30, Autrijus Tang wrote:
>Today I've started implementing typing relations for value types in
>FP6. ...
Shouldn't this have gone to perl6-internals, not perl6-language?
On Fri, Feb 04, 2005 at 12:19:36AM +0800, Autrijus Tang wrote:
> Uh, as this is an ask-for-clarification for a Synopsis, I think p6l
> is the correct forum. Of course, as I'm new to this list, I may be
> totally wrong, in which case please tell me so. :-)
To be more precise, according to S06:
On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 11:17:50AM -0500, Mark J. Reed wrote:
>
> On 2005-02-03 at 11:13:30, Autrijus Tang wrote:
> >Today I've started implementing typing relations for value types in
> >FP6. ...
>
> Shouldn't this have gone to perl6-internals, not perl6-language?
Uh, as this is an ask
Today I've started implementing typing relations for value types in
FP6. I intend to hold off subtyping until the simple types can be
checked and matched against smoothly. The types are currently:
VBool Boolean
VIntInteger
VNumNumber
VStrString
V
12 matches
Mail list logo
