From: "Nathan Wiger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2001 4:41 PM
Subject: ~ for concat / negation (Re: The Perl 6 Emulator)
> Does anyone else see a problem with =~ ? Plus, it makes the
> pre-plus-concat that many desire impossible, since
At 05:17 AM 6/22/2001 -0700, Benjamin Stuhl wrote:
> > In summary:
> >
> >1. I don't like ~ for concat
> >
> >2. But if it does become concat, then we still
> > shouldn't
> > change ~'s current unary meaning
> >
> >
> > Thanks for listening.
> >
> > -Nate
>
>I agree completely. Howev
> In summary:
>
>1. I don't like ~ for concat
>
>2. But if it does become concat, then we still
> shouldn't
> change ~'s current unary meaning
>
>
> Thanks for listening.
>
> -Nate
I agree completely. However, this is no longer really a
topic for -internals, it's really a pure
